• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Attacks on Mac OS X Exploded by 1,550% in 2007

One of Apple's strong points is twofold: the fact that it's rarely targetted for malicious attacks, and it's security against those that are directed at it. Has Apple been lulled into complacency? Im not trying to be a fear monger, but with Apple becoming more popular, I can see some REAL exploits being directed at Apple OS.

Here's the article

Attacks on Mac OS X Exploded by 1,550% in 2007 ? Just a 36% Growth for Windows - According to Kaspersky

Windows is without a doubt the most attacked platform in the world. Microsoft's proprietary operating system attracts no less than 96.36% of the world's malicious code, according to malware statistics for 2007, released by Kaspersky. But while Windows leads by a landslide when it comes down to the actual volume of malware that preys on it, Apple's Mac OS X is also a leader in a top that is designed to provide little comfort for its users. OS X is the top platform in terms of the increase of attacks throughout 2007. While the volume of attacks impacting Windows has only grown by 36% from the first half of the past year, compared to the second half, those on Mac OS X exploded by no less than 1,550%.

"Despite the fact that the share of malicious programs for the Win32 environment amounted to 96.36% in 2007, it began to slowly but surely decline. The percentage of threats targeting platforms other than Win32 increased from 3.18% to 3.42% in the first six months of 2007, and exceeded 4% in the second half of the year. (admittedly not muc, emphasis mine) Growth for the full year amounted to 3.64%. In the last six months of 2007, the number of malicious programs, AdWare and potentially malicious programs for Win32 increased 36% from the first half of the year," explained Alexander Gostev. Senior Virus Analyst, Kaspersky Lab.

Enlarge pictureAside from Windows, the remaining platforms experienced an increase in attacks of no less than 63%. There is the example of the open source Linux operating system, affected by 121 attacks in H1 2007 and just 45 in H2, therefore a decrease of 63%. At the opposite pole is Mac OS X. In the first half of the past year, Mac OS X suffered just 2 attacks. This number grew by 33 in the second half or a jump of 1,550%. Of course that actually reading Kaspersky's malware statistics per platform in 2007 it is clear that Windows was impacted by 228,593 attacks, while Linux and Mac OS X by just 166 and respectively 35.

"The irrefutable leader (+1550%) was the MacOS X operating system, which was attacked 35 times in 2007, and 33 of those attacks took place in the second half of the year. Our half-yearly report observed the strange absence of any new malicious programs targeting that platform, despite the fact that it was targeted more and more often (over the course of one year, from June 2006 through May 2007, no new malicious programs were created for this platform). But towards the end of the year, the situation changed and matched expert predictions. The most prevalent types of malicious program designed for Macs in 2007 were Trojans, including those which substitute user DNS requests and which are designed to conduct phishing attacks to steal data," Gostev added.
 
Are you kidding? Windows is impacted by over 200,000 attacks and Apple is impacted by 35 and you're hypothesizing that Apple has been "lulled into complacency"? :roll:
 
Originally posted by: MrChad
Are you kidding? Windows is impacted by over 200,000 attacks and Apple is impacted by 35 and you're hypothesizing that Apple has been "lulled into complacency"? :roll:

Talk about blowing things out of proportion. WAY out.
 
When dealing with such small numbers, percentages are going to look startlingly high. Many people expect the number of attacks on Macs to increase because of their growth in the market. But for OSX and Windows to be apples to apples, OSX needs a hell of a lot more market share and install base. You've got many millions more Windows boxes sitting idle on high speed connections.
 
lol, I began to read this with interest. I can't believe somebody wrote this dribble. I have been using computers since I was a kid with a 386 and dos and moved to windows 3.1 and on to 95, 98, 2k and finally xp for probably 7 years. I am also running kubuntu linux on my old dell laptop. I just started using osx within the year in my professional life and have almost completely migrated in my personal life as well (still game on the pc). I just think as a os solution it is far superior to anything else on the market. I won't go into those details because I don't want to come across as a mac fanatic but once you get it its just so nice. I used to resist it and I talked about the price of the hardware and the lack of power of the g3, g4 and g5 cpus but I think all that has changed. If I had to use one word to describe the os it would be - elegant
 
just goes to show any OS can be vulnerable. people hammered XP about how insecure it is, which it is but only cause its most used, if OSX had MS's userbase, then we'd be reading opposite news.
either way, $.99 will still buy you a bag of chips
 
It's a pretty useful post if for no other reason than to reaffirm the fact that statistics lie. People from all over the place, especially government like to throw around numbers to prove a point, or further a selfish goal. It's always a good idea to look at hard numbers, and not rely on a statistical percentage to get the true picture :^)
 
Back
Top