• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ATT@home back online -- who needs Excite jerks

SimMike2

Platinum Member
Since ATT cable Internet is back up and running, why pay $300 million for Excite@home? Maybe I am missing something, but Excite gets all huffy and convinces a judge to pull the plug on @home and the next day my ATT cable internet service is up and running with different IP addresses, mail and news servers. I say who needs Excite. They can take their fricking network and shove it where the sun don't shine. I'll neve forgive them for unceremoniously trashing all my @home e-mail.

Why did ATT want to pay $300 for Excite if they already had a system in place?
 
Because they wanted the whole network, with the way things worked out AT&T only got ~850,000 users out of the ~5Million @Home has.

Oh and not all of us have been so lucky as you, I'm in Pittsburgh and so far nothing.
 
Back
Top