AT's GPU 2015 Benchmarks and the lack of CF/SLI results

[Elixer]

I was always curious, why doesn't AT have more cards in their benches, and also have CF & SLI results as well?

There is only 1 980 SLI, and no crossfire, except for the 295x2.
Other cards seem to not even be there at all, like the 960 is MIA, (as is the review), but, that is still a newish card.
It would be nice to also see tri & quad fire/SLI as well.

Is it a case of lack of manpower, lack of free cards, (newegg/amazon/whomever else can't hook you guys up?) or what?


Something like doing this

 

[NTMBK]

Probably because almost no-one uses SLI or Crossfire? http://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphics/38134-crossfire-and-sli-market-is-just-300-000-units

 

[waffleironhead]

Too cheap to buy a second card to test or no one gave them a free second card.

 

[ShintaiDK]

Probably because almost no-one uses SLI or Crossfire? http://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphics/38134-crossfire-and-sli-market-is-just-300-000-units

I think its time for the companies to consider to drop SLi/CF completely. It would be cheaper and better for (almost) everyone.

 

[Ryan Smith]

Generally it's due to a lack of time and/or cards. I only have 1 Fury X and 1 GTX 980 Ti, for example. And as you've seen with the Fury reviews, just getting those done is a full time affair and doesn't leave time for much else.

SLI/CF is something I'd like to do, it's just not likely to happen on our current schedule.