• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ATOT post apocalypse Zombie meet?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
epic_zombie_moose_by_lolli_chan-d30td1d.jpg


See zombie moose, wat do?
 
I would say that only you retards could let a zombie thread turn into a neckbeard vs. guns thread...but it's also a techs thread....so it cancels out.

carry on.
 
zinfamous said:
I would say that only you retards could let a zombie thread turn into a neckbeard vs. guns thread...but it's also a techs thread....so it cancels out.

carry on.
Click to expand...

Hadn't thought of it that way....hell we're lucky this thread didn't spawn a black hole.
 
zinfamous said:
I would say that only you retards could let a zombie thread turn into a neckbeard vs. guns thread...but it's also a techs thread....so it cancels out.

carry on.
Click to expand...

Yup. People feel the urge to troll every time I'm in the thread, they love it they do they love it.
 
Hal9000 and Techs cancel each other out?
Does that mean Techs is Dave Bowman? Or is he actually Doctor Sivasubramanian Chandrasegarampillai?

In order to have a post apocalypse zombie meet, there first must be a zombie apocalypse. We are pretty close to that point right now (Glen Beck fans = zombies)
 
HAL9000 said:
No it's not. So you are just worried about being raped?



You're assuming you have to have some weapon to defend yourself.



I understand, and there are rare occasions when killing someone is warranted, but rape isn't one of them, pre-emptive killing is even more rarely warranted. I'm completely against killing except in the rarest situations.
Click to expand...

This is stupid. Sometimes rape results in death. IE - The attacker rapes and then kills. By killing him first, he doesn't get the chance to end the victim's life. When someone is committing the act of rape, you can damn sure bet that he doesn't give a flying fiddlestick about the well being of the person he is attacking. And regardless of his victim's size, if she is or isn't physically capable of fighting him off is of no consequence.

Rape is such as life impacting event that the idea of killing the rapist is certainly not out of the equation. If my choices are to lead a somewhat normal life after being attacked and killing my attacker, or living a life post rape, I choose killing the rapist.
 
mvbighead said:
This is stupid. Sometimes rape results in death. IE - The attacker rapes and then kills. By killing him first, he doesn't get the chance to end the victim's life. When someone is committing the act of rape, you can damn sure bet that he doesn't give a flying fiddlestick about the well being of the person he is attacking. And regardless of his victim's size, if she is or isn't physically capable of fighting him off is of no consequence.

Rape is such as life impacting event that the idea of killing the rapist is certainly not out of the equation. If my choices are to lead a somewhat normal life after being attacked and killing my attacker, or living a life post rape, I choose killing the rapist.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, you are entitled to think that, but personally I don't believe pre-emptively executing people for crimes other than murder is wrong.
 
BurnItDwn said:
Hal9000 and Techs cancel each other out?
Does that mean Techs is Dave Bowman? Or is he actually Doctor Sivasubramanian Chandrasegarampillai?

In order to have a post apocalypse zombie meet, there first must be a zombie apocalypse. We are pretty close to that point right now (Glen Beck fans = zombies)
Click to expand...

Actually Mr. Smith cancels out Hal 9000
 
HAL9000 said:
Fair enough, you are entitled to think that, but personally I don't believe pre-emptively executing people for crimes other than murder is wrong.
Click to expand...


You've been arguing this too long - read that over again. You've switched sides, darlin'!!! :biggrin:


(insert giggling here)
 
Last edited:
unxpurg8d said:
You've been arguing this too long - read that over again. You've switched sides, darlin'!!! :biggrin:


(insert giggling here)
Click to expand...

Really? I'm against gun ownership, I'm against killing people, I'm against murder, I'm against rape, I'm for defending your self.

Where did I contradict any of these points.
 
HAL9000 said:
Really? I'm against gun ownership, I'm against killing people, I'm against murder, I'm against rape, I'm for defending your self.

Where did I contradict any of these points.
Click to expand...


"personally I don't believe pre-emptively executing people for crimes other than murder is wrong."

You said this. No editing it to correct it now. 😛
 
HAL9000 said:
Yep that's what I said, no editing, I don't see the issue.
Click to expand...


Read it over to yourself sllllllllllllllllllllllloooooooooooooowwwwllllly.

Sigh.

"I don't believe pre-emptively executing people for crimes other than murder is wrong"

Heck, I was only gonna shoot 'em if they threatened my life - YOUR stance is kill 'em pre-emptively for anything short of murder also?! Whoohooo! :biggrin:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top