ATOT post apocalypse Zombie meet?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

schneiderguy

Lifer
Jun 26, 2006
10,801
91
91
epic_zombie_moose_by_lolli_chan-d30td1d.jpg


See zombie moose, wat do?
 

unxpurg8d

Golden Member
Apr 7, 2000
1,373
0
71
As the OP I think its time for the mods to lock this puppy up.


Awwwwwwwwww.... we'll play nice. Honest.


:biggrin:

Unless it wasn't the bear poking but the pink bunny-suited zombie that put it over the top for you....
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,866
31,364
146
I would say that only you retards could let a zombie thread turn into a neckbeard vs. guns thread...but it's also a techs thread....so it cancels out.

carry on.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
I would say that only you retards could let a zombie thread turn into a neckbeard vs. guns thread...but it's also a techs thread....so it cancels out.

carry on.

Hadn't thought of it that way....hell we're lucky this thread didn't spawn a black hole.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
I would say that only you retards could let a zombie thread turn into a neckbeard vs. guns thread...but it's also a techs thread....so it cancels out.

carry on.

Yup. People feel the urge to troll every time I'm in the thread, they love it they do they love it.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,353
1,862
126
Hal9000 and Techs cancel each other out?
Does that mean Techs is Dave Bowman? Or is he actually Doctor Sivasubramanian Chandrasegarampillai?

In order to have a post apocalypse zombie meet, there first must be a zombie apocalypse. We are pretty close to that point right now (Glen Beck fans = zombies)
 

mvbighead

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2009
3,793
1
81
No it's not. So you are just worried about being raped?



You're assuming you have to have some weapon to defend yourself.



I understand, and there are rare occasions when killing someone is warranted, but rape isn't one of them, pre-emptive killing is even more rarely warranted. I'm completely against killing except in the rarest situations.

This is stupid. Sometimes rape results in death. IE - The attacker rapes and then kills. By killing him first, he doesn't get the chance to end the victim's life. When someone is committing the act of rape, you can damn sure bet that he doesn't give a flying fiddlestick about the well being of the person he is attacking. And regardless of his victim's size, if she is or isn't physically capable of fighting him off is of no consequence.

Rape is such as life impacting event that the idea of killing the rapist is certainly not out of the equation. If my choices are to lead a somewhat normal life after being attacked and killing my attacker, or living a life post rape, I choose killing the rapist.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
This is stupid. Sometimes rape results in death. IE - The attacker rapes and then kills. By killing him first, he doesn't get the chance to end the victim's life. When someone is committing the act of rape, you can damn sure bet that he doesn't give a flying fiddlestick about the well being of the person he is attacking. And regardless of his victim's size, if she is or isn't physically capable of fighting him off is of no consequence.

Rape is such as life impacting event that the idea of killing the rapist is certainly not out of the equation. If my choices are to lead a somewhat normal life after being attacked and killing my attacker, or living a life post rape, I choose killing the rapist.

Fair enough, you are entitled to think that, but personally I don't believe pre-emptively executing people for crimes other than murder is wrong.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Hal9000 and Techs cancel each other out?
Does that mean Techs is Dave Bowman? Or is he actually Doctor Sivasubramanian Chandrasegarampillai?

In order to have a post apocalypse zombie meet, there first must be a zombie apocalypse. We are pretty close to that point right now (Glen Beck fans = zombies)

Actually Mr. Smith cancels out Hal 9000
 

unxpurg8d

Golden Member
Apr 7, 2000
1,373
0
71
Fair enough, you are entitled to think that, but personally I don't believe pre-emptively executing people for crimes other than murder is wrong.


You've been arguing this too long - read that over again. You've switched sides, darlin'!!! :biggrin:


(insert giggling here)
 
Last edited:

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
You've been arguing this too long - read that over again. You've switched sides, darlin'!!! :biggrin:


(insert giggling here)

Really? I'm against gun ownership, I'm against killing people, I'm against murder, I'm against rape, I'm for defending your self.

Where did I contradict any of these points.
 

unxpurg8d

Golden Member
Apr 7, 2000
1,373
0
71
Really? I'm against gun ownership, I'm against killing people, I'm against murder, I'm against rape, I'm for defending your self.

Where did I contradict any of these points.


"personally I don't believe pre-emptively executing people for crimes other than murder is wrong."

You said this. No editing it to correct it now. :p
 

unxpurg8d

Golden Member
Apr 7, 2000
1,373
0
71
Yep that's what I said, no editing, I don't see the issue.


Read it over to yourself sllllllllllllllllllllllloooooooooooooowwwwllllly.

Sigh.

"I don't believe pre-emptively executing people for crimes other than murder is wrong"

Heck, I was only gonna shoot 'em if they threatened my life - YOUR stance is kill 'em pre-emptively for anything short of murder also?! Whoohooo! :biggrin: