Is anyone using this instead of the Catalyst Control Center? I'm interested in giving it a go, and would like to know what advantages it offers over the CCC.
I use both. ATT has FPS counter, Vsync forcing, Custom refresh rates, AF & Pixel optimizations, game profiles, a ton of stuff. It's about 10 times smaller than CCC.
I use both. ATT has FPS counter, Vsync forcing, Custom refresh rates, AF & Pixel optimizations, game profiles, a ton of stuff. It's about 10 times smaller than CCC.
ATT is nice cuz it has both overclocking and d3d triple buffering features. It would be nice if I could ditch MSI afterburner and d3doverrider to have a single program to get the job done, but alas it didn't have vcore control IIRC (either that, or didn't allow for higher voltages to be actually useful, forgot which).
I use ATT instead of CCC. ATT has this nice feature of auto overclocking. I set a very low 2D clock and a high 3D clock which ATT switches between automatically. this feature I don't see in CCC. And you can force AA in some games not supporting AA natively I believe although I never use this feature from ATT.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.