ATI Technologies Unwraps RADEON 9550

nemesismk2

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2001
4,810
5
76
www.ultimatehardware.net
Reports over various web-sites suggest that ATI Technologies is planning to broaden its range of DirectX 9.0-supporting graphics cards with extremely cost-effective offering based on the same VPU as the company?s mainstream products.

ATI?s RADEON 9550 is down-clocked RADEON 9600 featuring 128MB of DDR SDRAM memory with 128-bit bus, Chinese web-site HardSpell.com believes. Graphics cards based on the RADEON 9550 will work at 250MHz/400MHz speeds for chip/memory, 75MHz below core clock-speed provided by the RADEON 9600. Additionally, ATI may roll-out a version of the RADEON 9550 with 64-bit bus. Sources assume that the price of the RADEON 9550 that is expected to be formally announced in early April will be in the range of $70 - $85.

All graphics cards based on the RADEON 9550 and RADEON 9600-series VPUs are based on processors code-named RV350 and RV360. From architectural stand-point these two chips are same and feature 4 pixel and 2 vertex pipelines, but the RV360 is made using more advanced 0.13 micron low-k fabrication technology.

RADEON 9550 graphics processors will have nothing to do with the RADEON 9500 and RADEON 9500 PRO chips that are based on the R300 architecture and offer different number of pipelines as well as dissimilar set of capabilities.

With the latest additions included, ATI and its add-in card partners would offer 6 solutions based on the RV350/RV360 chips with different clock-speeds, but the same DirectX 9.0 capabilities:

RADEON 9600 XT ? 500MHz visual processing unit, 128MB/256MB 600MHz memory with 128-bit bus;

RADEON 9600 PRO ? 400MHz visual processing unit, 128MB/256MB 600MHz memory with 128-bit bus;

RADEON 9600 ? 325MHz visual processing unit, 128MB 400MHz memory with 128-bit bus;

RADEON 9550 ? 250MHz visual processing unit, 128MB 400MHz memory with 128-bit bus;

RADEON 9600 SE ? 325MHz visual processing unit, 128MB 400MHz memory with 64-bit bus.

RADEON 9550 SE ? 250MHz visual processing unit, 128MB 400MHz memory with 64-bit bus;

Despite of the fact that the majority of expensive DirectX 9.0 compliant graphics cards usually acquired by computer enthusiasts sold last year were based on VPUs from ATI Technologies, its arch-rival NVIDIA seems to be making a good progress in entry-level and mainstream market segments with its GeForce FX 5200, 5600 and 5700 technologies, which is indisputably a success. Additionally, the company wants to address more market segments with very thoroughly tailored graphics processors to offer attractive price performance ratio for its customers. Increased competition from the GeForce FX 5500 and GeForce FX 5700LE based on the 5200 and 5700-series processors from NVIDIA might lead ATI to shape its RADEON 9600-series for very cost-effective segments.

ATI Technologies did not comment on the matter.

ATI Technologies Unwraps RADEON 9550
 

nemesismk2

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2001
4,810
5
76
www.ultimatehardware.net
I personally think that it's a great move by ATI to cover all markets like Nvidia did with the fx5200. I doubt any of the video cards listed above will run dx9 software especially quickly but atleast they will run. For games companies to release more dx9 only games then they have to be convinced that there is a market for dx9 software.

So IMO more dx9 video cards sold = more dx9 games which can't be a bad thing! :)
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: nemesismk2
I personally think that it's a great move by ATI to cover all markets like Nvidia did with the fx5200. I doubt any of the video cards listed above will run dx9 software especially quickly but atleast they will run. For games companies to release more dx9 only games then they have to be convinced that there is a market for dx9 software.

So IMO more dx9 video cards sold = more dx9 games which can't be a bad thing! :)

The flaw with your statement there is that in the technical sense, an FX5200 64MB 64-bit is a "DX9 video card." I'll let you draw your own conclusions from there. :p

- M4H
 

nemesismk2

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2001
4,810
5
76
www.ultimatehardware.net
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: nemesismk2
I personally think that it's a great move by ATI to cover all markets like Nvidia did with the fx5200. I doubt any of the video cards listed above will run dx9 software especially quickly but atleast they will run. For games companies to release more dx9 only games then they have to be convinced that there is a market for dx9 software.

So IMO more dx9 video cards sold = more dx9 games which can't be a bad thing! :)

The flaw with your statement there is that in the technical sense, an FX5200 64MB 64-bit is a "DX9 video card." I'll let you draw your own conclusions from there. :p

- M4H

I guess the plain english compaign hasn't reached Canada just yet!:p

 

chsh1ca

Golden Member
Feb 17, 2003
1,179
0
0
Why? This is what we have Radeon 9600SEs for is it not?
This looks like this card will be manufactured using 150-nm tech, given this line:
All graphics cards based on the RADEON 9550 and RADEON 9600-series VPUs are based on processors code-named RV350 and RV360. From architectural stand-point these two chips are same and feature 4 pixel and 2 vertex pipelines, but the RV360 is made using more advanced 0.13 micron low-k fabrication technology.
Why go to a larger, hotter die?

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
I guess the plain english compaign hasn't reached Canada just yet!:p
Yeah, it did, you just missed it, it passed by the Giant Igloo(tm) a week ago. :D

 

Peter

Elite Member
Oct 15, 1999
9,640
1
0
They're just disposing of those GPU chips that fail testing at 325 MHz.

Besides, the list above is missing the 9600 "ProEZ", 400/400 clock. And as usual, the memory frequencies are doubled from the actual MHz figures. (DDR does not mean nor equal clock doubling!)

If that 9550 stuff is coming on stage to replace the 9200 range, sign me up!
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
seriously, when the new line comes out, the 9600Xt can be had for $100 and 9800 pro for something like $150. why bother with anything less for DX9?
 

modedepe

Diamond Member
May 11, 2003
3,474
0
0
Well, if they do indeed produce a 64 bit version of this, there should be a lot of competition between it and the fx5200 for the title of "worst dx9 card on the planet."
 

nemesismk2

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2001
4,810
5
76
www.ultimatehardware.net
Originally posted by: modedepe
Well, if they do indeed produce a 64 bit version of this, there should be a lot of competition between it and the fx5200 for the title of "worst dx9 card on the planet."

Oh I'm pretty sure the "worst dx9 card on the planet" will be going to the fx5200 (64bit). As if the 64bit memory bus didn't strangle it's performance enough the 166mhz memory
reduces it's performance even further! ;)
 

Peter

Elite Member
Oct 15, 1999
9,640
1
0
Some of you need a perspective adjustment ... by far not everyone cares about 3D speed. Plenty of people just need the complete feature set but very little performance at all.

Now if a 9550 and 9550SE step in to replace 9200 and 9200SE, that'll be what those people will get - at least from me.
 

nemesismk2

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2001
4,810
5
76
www.ultimatehardware.net
Originally posted by: Peter
Some of you need a perspective adjustment ... by far not everyone cares about 3D speed. Plenty of people just need the complete feature set but very little performance at all.

They don't care about 3D speed? What kind of perverts are they? I'm going to have to go play UT2004 until those obscene evil thoughts you've put in my head are gone! :Q

Next you will be telling me they all own Celeron processors? ;)
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Originally posted by: Peter
Some of you need a perspective adjustment ... by far not everyone cares about 3D speed. Plenty of people just need the complete feature set but very little performance at all.

They don't care about 3D speed? What kind of perverts are they? I'm going to have to go play UT2004 until those obscene evil thoughts you've put in my head are gone! :Q

Next you will be telling me they all own Celeron processors? ;)

What, Grandma doesn't knit anymore?

- M4H
 

pukemon

Senior member
Jun 16, 2000
850
0
76
Originally posted by: Peter
Some of you need a perspective adjustment ... by far not everyone cares about 3D speed. Plenty of people just need the complete feature set but very little performance at all.

Now if a 9550 and 9550SE step in to replace 9200 and 9200SE, that'll be what those people will get - at least from me.

probably. or more like a step up from the radeon 7000's that are still out there. also for the folks looking to build quiet, low power, cool running boxes for whatever purposes (file server, standalone dedicated network server) it should be more than fine.

for anything else, eek. no.
 

Peter

Elite Member
Oct 15, 1999
9,640
1
0
nemesis, I still have users with below-200-MHz Pentium I and Cyrix M2 processors, and they're happy with what they have. And meself's work box has a 9200SE, because all I'm asking is dualhead support and fanlessness.
 

JackHawksmoor

Senior member
Dec 10, 2000
431
0
0
The flaw with your statement there is that in the technical sense, an FX5200 64MB 64-bit is a "DX9 video card." I'll let you draw your own conclusions from there.

What? Are you claiming 2fps isn't a playable framerate? The 5200 is a perfectly acceptable PS 2.0 card!