ATi Radeon X800XT Core Breaks 600Mhz Barrier

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
Press Release

BARCELONA, Spain ? ATI Technologies (NASDAQ: ATYT, TSX: ATY) demonstrated the awesome graphics power of the RADEON? X800 XT Platinum Edition visual processing unit (VPU) by setting new graphics speed records* in a variety of games and industry-leading graphics benchmarks. The event took place at System Builder Summit in Barcelona.

Notably, a new world record score of 15,738 was set in Futuremark?s 3DMark2003 graphics benchmark, easily breaking the previous score of 10,008, which was also set using ATI graphics technology.

The record score of 15,738 in 3DMark2003 was set using the default screen resolution of 1024x768 pixels with 32-bit color depth, as required by Futuremark for eligibility in Futuremark?s Hall of Fame. A record score of 33,484 was also set in Futuremark?s popular 3DMark2001 benchmark at the same resolution.

?The RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition is clearly the weapon of choice for setting graphics speed records,? said graphics enthusiast Sami Mäkinen, who designed, assembled and operated the PC used to set the record graphics scores. ?ATI truly delivers monster performance with their latest generation of graphics technology.?

Scores in UT2004 (147 fps) and Tomb Raider (76 fps) were posted using the most demanding image quality settings commonly used by the gaming community: 1600x1200 pixels with 32-bit color depth using 4X anti-aliasing and 8X anisotropic filtering.

?Record scores in some of the world?s most visually advanced games at the highest image quality settings is proof that with ATI?s RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition, users no longer need to sacrifice speed to get impeccable image quality,? said Peter Edinger, Vice President, ATI Europe, Middle East and Africa.

All applications were run on a system featuring an overclocked RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition running at 715 MHz engine clocks and 639 MHz memory clocks, an overclocked Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor, 1 GB of DDR SDRAM, a 40 GB IDE hard drive, proprietary cooling technology, and CATALYST drivers that conform to the Futuremark specification for posting Hall of Fame benchmark scores.

Also this year at Systems Builder Summit, ATI took home three prestigious awards including Best Presentation, Best Hardware and Best Vendor.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
And some of you said it couldn't scale?

Naysayers = OWNED :p

NVIDIA = OWNED

Rachel's job in France = OWNED :D
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
And some of you said it couldn't scale?
no 'we' didn't . . . we just said the nV40 core would scale (ultimately) better.

It isn't that the r420 isn't impressive - it is; it's just the r300 'on steroids'.

And what kind of proprietary cooling technology? You don't think this GPU was hand-picked?

Gainwald expects to O/C the "400Mhz nV40 core" to ~600Mhz Now THAT's an O/C. ;)

:D

"Fun" Stuff about the ATi vs nVidia rivalry:
Nvidia banned from Barcelona . . .

Our friends in Barcelona tell us that actually its blood enemy ATI bought two last keynote slots to leave Nvidia's Roy Taylor empty-handed and keep Nvidia out.

What we heard from CPU guys in last few days is that Nvidia and ATI are worse enemies than Intel and AMD and they sure are. . . .


[/quote]
 

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
715Mhz > 600Mhz

:p

Most impressive is that everyone thought 600Mhz was some sort barrier for .13mu...but not for ATI. Now that is impressive engineering, IMO.
 

Yourself

Platinum Member
Jan 3, 2000
2,542
0
71
Did they happen to mention what type of cooling? Probably something "non-stock" :D


Self
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
715Mhz > 600Mhz

:p

But which one will be "faster"?

the r420's core clock STARTS OUT clocked 100mhz HIGHer then the nV40's. :p

:roll:

EDIT" Cooling=proprietary cooling technology
(liquid nitrogen?) :p

2nd edit: GTA, Whose "everyone"? :p

and WHICH card are YOU getting? (are you gonna have an EXTRA HL2 coupon?)
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
And some of you said it couldn't scale?
no 'we' didn't . . . we just said the nV40 core would scale (ultimately) better.

It isn't that the r420 isn't impressive - it is; it's just the r300 'on steroids'.

And what kind of proprietary cooling technology? You don't think this GPU was hand-picked?

Gainwald expects to O/C the "400Mhz nV40 core" to ~600Mhz Now THAT's an O/C. ;)

:D

"Fun" Stuff about the ATi vs nVidia rivalry:
Nvidia banned from Barcelona . . .

Our friends in Barcelona tell us that actually its blood enemy ATI bought two last keynote slots to leave Nvidia's Roy Taylor empty-handed and keep Nvidia out.

What we heard from CPU guys in last few days is that Nvidia and ATI are worse enemies than Intel and AMD and they sure are. . . .
[/quote]


Riiiiiiiiiiight, and NVIDIA's Ultra Extreme GPUs aren't "hand picked?" :roll: :roll: :roll:

NVIDIA: 400MHz --> 600MHz
ATI: 500MHz --> 715MHz
 

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
Yes, I too would like more info on the cooling. I bet it's not as exotic as some would want to believe...

cough, apoppin, cough
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
And some of you said it couldn't scale?
no 'we' didn't . . . we just said the nV40 core would scale (ultimately) better.

It isn't that the r420 isn't impressive - it is; it's just the r300 'on steroids'.

And what kind of proprietary cooling technology? You don't think this GPU was hand-picked?

Gainwald expects to O/C the "400Mhz nV40 core" to ~600Mhz Now THAT's an O/C. ;)

:D

"Fun" Stuff about the ATi vs nVidia rivalry:
Nvidia banned from Barcelona . . .

Our friends in Barcelona tell us that actually its blood enemy ATI bought two last keynote slots to leave Nvidia's Roy Taylor empty-handed and keep Nvidia out.

What we heard from CPU guys in last few days is that Nvidia and ATI are worse enemies than Intel and AMD and they sure are. . . .


Riiiiiiiiiiight, and NVIDIA's Ultra Extreme GPUs aren't "hand picked?" :roll: :roll: :roll:

NVIDIA: 400MHz --> 600MHz
ATI: 500MHz --> 715MHz[/quote]i hope so . . . it's be EMBARASSING to try an o/c a "dud" - nV40 OR r420. :p

What card are you getting, NSF4? I am looking for an EXTRA HL-2 coupon to buy. :roll:

:D
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Yes, I too would like more info on the cooling. I bet it's not as exotic as some would want to believe...

cough, apoppin, cough

Can't get any more exotic than two power leads and taking up two slots :p
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Yes, I too would like more info on the cooling. I bet it's not as exotic as some would want to believe...

cough, apoppin, cough

Can't get any more exotic than two power leads and taking up two slots :p
i have a feeling that ati will follow nVidia's lead . . . the r500 is gonna be pretty "exotic". :p

:roll:

But we're gonna have to wait a LOONG time to discuss this . . . what cards are you guys actually looking forward to buying . . . i am now pretty certain i am getting a 6800u.

;)
 

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
I stand corrected...looks like an exotic solution...

Whatever ATI has available around December is probably what I'll end up with, but if I were buying today, it would be a X800 PRO or AIW X800 PRO.

I need to upgrade my entire system too: my P4 2.0A running on an ASUS P4B266 (single-channel DDR with 400Mhz FSB) is ancient!
 

Xernex

Senior member
Jul 15, 2002
304
0
0
LOL yeah whats the point of these numbers though how many of us can afford cooling more expensive than the card its self and lucky enough to get an insanely overclockable card to?
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Xernex
LOL yeah whats the point of these numbers though how many of us can afford cooling more expensive than the card its self and lucky enough to get an insanely overclockable card to?

Braggin' Rights

duh


:roll:

(coincidently, just yesterday) I sold my (useless to me now) Dell notebook to"afford" one. ;)
 

UlricT

Golden Member
Jul 21, 2002
1,966
0
0
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I stand corrected...looks like an exotic solution...

Whatever ATI has available around December is probably what I'll end up with, but if I were buying today, it would be a X800 PRO or AIW X800 PRO.

I need to upgrade my entire system too: my P4 2.0A running on an ASUS P4B266 (single-channel DDR with 400Mhz FSB) is ancient!

wtf? what is that on the pics #7-8? I fscking hope that aint frozen condensate !!!
 

Xernex

Senior member
Jul 15, 2002
304
0
0
I know this is a little offtopic but when should we expect ATI and nvidia's next gen of cards like the R500, end of year?
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
"the 33484 was done on a A64 @3G and with X800Pro (12pipe) @696/560 or so and old beta drivers on WinXP system. Nature was 252 or so."

With a 12pipe pro.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
The 16 pipe overclocked more than the 12 pipe, Apoppin.
sorry, having too much 'fun'; it DOES say PE right in the bolded quote . . . :Q

Congrats to ATI. Superb o/c



i'm still gettin an nV40 . .. gotta support the underdog. ;)

:D