ATI Drivers

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,959
157
106
One thing I love about them is you can do a custom install and decide on what you want to install. My question is do I really need the HDMI/DP Audio driver, CCC and ATI Drag and Drop ? I like to install just the drivers. Is there any benefits of installing all this other stuff?
 

Dark4ng3l

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2000
5,061
1
0
Well if you don't need those things then by all means don't install them. CCC is very useful if you want to force settings in a game or change the quality of the AA used, etc though.
 

Schmide

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2002
5,745
1,036
126
Yeah but it's better to have the driver on the system, a missing/out dated driver may cause problems even if it isn't used. (sleep state, legacy mode, etc)

Edit: seriously you're talking a few KB on a GB system

Edit2: Microsoft is going to install its outdated driver anyways, so you're basically just choosing to run an outdated driver.
 
Last edited:

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,959
157
106
Yeah but it's better to have the driver on the system, a missing/out dated driver may cause problems even if it isn't used. (sleep state, legacy mode, etc)

Edit: seriously you're talking a few KB on a GB system

Edit2: Microsoft is going to install its outdated driver anyways, so you're basically just choosing to run an outdated driver.

What in the heck are you even talking about? The HDMI/DP Audio driver? How would it effect sleep state, legacy mode, etc ? What is legacy mode anyway ?

I never used HDMI before. Not sure about DP though.
 

Schmide

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2002
5,745
1,036
126
Devices register with the system regardless of if you use them. They have a driver and are in some sort active state as long as the system is running even if you're not throwing data at them. When the system sleeps they are sent a message to serialize their state and power down. In most cases the basic driver will work fine, it's just better to be safe than sorry. How much are you saving anyways?

It is best practice to run with the latest vendor/company drivers and not the Microsoft legacy drivers. (i.e. basic compatibility)

Edit: Sorry for not answering this. Legacy mode is a basic functional mode usually intended on providing just enough functionality to get the system running. A famous case where one device in legacy mode can slow a series of devices is with drives and PIO mode (Programmed input/output) if one device goes into this state it can effect the whole system.
 
Last edited:

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,959
157
106
Devices register with the system regardless of if you use them. They have a driver and are in some sort active state as long as the system is running even if you're not throwing data at them. When the system sleeps they are sent a message to serialize their state and power down. In most cases the basic driver will work fine, it's just better to be safe than sorry. How much are you saving anyways?

It is best practice to run with the latest vendor drivers and not the Microsoft legacy drivers. (i.e. basic compatibility)

Hmmm. Tell that to everyone here who says not to install the latest motherboard chipset drivers when installing Windows Vista or 7. If it is not broke why fix it? Isn't it sorta like updating just for the heck of it ?
 

Schmide

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2002
5,745
1,036
126
Hmmm. Tell that to everyone here who says not to install the latest motherboard chipset drivers when installing Windows Vista or 7. If it is not broke why fix it? Isn't it sorta like updating just for the heck of it ?

Who is this everyone? That has to be one of the stupidest statements I've ever read here. I have no idea who would put it forth. Kind of like saying; if my car still moves, I'll never need to replace any component or ever do a tuneup. Screw the noises I'll just turn up the radio.

A modern OS is usually in an evolving state, patches, functionality updates, interdependence, (OS, driver, codex, application) and so on. Ignoring any one part may effect others.
 

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,959
157
106
Who is this everyone? That has to be one of the stupidest statements I've ever read here. I have no idea who would put it forth. Kind of like saying; if my car still moves, I'll never need to replace any component or ever do a tuneup. Screw the noises I'll just turn up the radio.

A modern OS is usually in an evolving state, patches, functionality updates, interdependence, (OS, driver, codex, application) and so on. Ignoring any one part may effect others.

The general anandtech community duh. I tried that once with installing all that nonsense stuff and it just caused more trouble than it was worth. That is why I am so careful in what I install nowadays. Sometimes it can be a pain to remove as well if it breaks something.
 

Schmide

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2002
5,745
1,036
126
The general anandtech community duh.

Duh? Kind of an appeal to commonality? Although I'm sure there can be disagreements in the community, I highly doubt this is common practice. Step one in trouble shooting is usually, have you updated your drivers?

I tried that once with installing all that nonsense stuff and it just caused more trouble than it was worth. That is why I am so careful in what I install nowadays. Sometimes it can be a pain to remove as well if it breaks something.

You can get into situations where mixing and matching newer and older drivers may causes problems. (Example: putting new raid drivers on old chipset drivers) It's probably a bad practice to selectively update some drivers while ignoring others. In my opinion keeping up on drivers tends to solve problems instead of causing them.

As much as there are some drivers that my be finicky, intel SSD drivers/firmware; when installing a suite of drivers like in this context of the ATI video card and supporting software, I think it's best to keep every part up to date.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,587
10,225
126
If you have a video card that supports HDMI audio (even via a DVI-HDMI adaptor), then install the newest driver for that functionality. To do otherwise is foolish.

Indeed, even on the older cards, a HD2600Pro AGP to be exact, Win7 installs a driver for the audio. You have to install a driver for the audio, and then disable that driver in Device Manager, otherwise it generates an interrupt storm that loads the CPU severely.
 

Voo

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2009
1,684
0
76
The general anandtech community duh. I tried that once with installing all that nonsense stuff and it just caused more trouble than it was worth. That is why I am so careful in what I install nowadays. Sometimes it can be a pain to remove as well if it breaks something.
The point is you already HAVE drivers for these devices installed, they're just the standard MS ones, so it's not about "do I install a driver?" but "which one do I use?". Also you can always roll back the drivers if there should be problems, where's the problem?
 

Dark Shroud

Golden Member
Mar 26, 2010
1,576
1
0
That is my whole point.

:\ Then you did not get is across very well. Here & most tech forums will recommend to install the official driver and keep it up to date. Niow when something goes wrong like the recent nVidia fiasco you'll hear about it and we'll say not to use it or roll back.

Now keeping up to date doesn't mean install extra un-needed software. For example take a look at all the junk Creative wants to install with Sound Blaster X-FI drivers.

Honestly unless someone is gaming or doing video editing I just install the driver only and leave the software suits out of it. Windows Update will take care of the rest if it's important enough.
 

Elvis2

Platinum Member
Jan 28, 2001
2,710
0
76
Well then, I must be old school. I'm still running the 9.12's and X -fi's 7 drivers (without all the junk). It plays all my games fine and I use my HDMI for gaming or watching a movie on my HDTV. I'm into Photoshop and video editing using my rig to record video's. I say if it works don't F w/it. I haven't even checked to see if my mb has an updated bios. Why? If it works, what's the need? Now if I decided to go Quad and need and update, of course I'll do it. But in the meantime I'm hummin' right along with a 1200mhz. o/c.
Peace,
E2
 

T2k

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,665
5
81
Hmmm. Tell that to everyone here who says not to install the latest motherboard chipset drivers when installing Windows Vista or 7. If it is not broke why fix it? Isn't it sorta like updating just for the heck of it ?

Iam really curious who's this "everybody" who never updates his/her drivers... :eek:
 

veri745

Golden Member
Oct 11, 2007
1,163
4
81
Iam really curious who's this "everybody" who never updates his/her drivers... :eek:

It sounds to me like he might be confusing BIOS updates with driver updates.

It's true that you shouldn't risk bricking your motherboard with a BIOS update if it's working fine.
 

MrK6

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2004
4,458
4
81
It sounds to me like he might be confusing BIOS updates with driver updates.

It's true that you shouldn't risk bricking your motherboard with a BIOS update if it's working fine.
Why the hell would updating your motherboard BIOS brick it?
 

Cogman

Lifer
Sep 19, 2000
10,286
145
106
Why the hell would updating your motherboard BIOS brick it?

In the old days, when MoBos didn't have bios backups, there was a real risk that when you installed a new bios, it wouldn't work properly (This is back in the day of "You can only update via floppies"). If your bios fails, that's it. game over. You have to have a functioning bios to update/repair the bios (Sort of a chicken and egg thing)

However, now, most Bioses provide backups that prevent a fatal update. So it is somewhat of a non-issue. I still will only update my bios if there are CPU compatibility or stability issues. Other then that, I tend not to touch it.

As for general driver updates? Why would you avoid them?