ATI drivers is this normal?

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
I really spent a lot of time leaning out my system.. always do. My default Win XP mem usage is 62MB..

I installed .net framework which is nessesary to install catalyst drivers.
Memuse went to 75MB. (this is kinda bugging me already)

Then I installed the frekken biggest bloat i have ever seen. Catalyst and mem use went to 180MB!!!

I am building a HTPC and wanted this card for it's VIVO and it was cheap.. but this is crazy I might sell this POS ASAP.
 

KeepItRed

Senior member
Jul 19, 2005
811
0
0
I've noticed something similar aswell...Before there was only 1 CLI.exe running in the Process Menu. Now there's 2 CLI.exe's since Catalyst 5.10. Not sure if this solves your problem, but I've noticed the usage increases...
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: KeepItRed
I've noticed something similar aswell...Before there was only 1 CLI.exe running in the Process Menu. Now there's 2 CLI.exe's since Catalyst 5.10. Not sure if this solves your problem, but I've noticed the usage increases...

I checked services and I can't even turn this service off how rediculous is that?!! greyed out!

nV drivers use about 8MB in comparison BTW not to mention they are 100% nicer.
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
Originally posted by: Zebo
I really spent a lot of time leaning out my system.. always do. My default Win XP mem usage is 62MB..

I installed .net framework which is nessesary to install catalyst drivers.
Memuse went to 75MB. (this is kinda bugging me already)

Then I installed the frekken biggest bloat i have ever seen. Catalyst and mem use went to 180MB!!!

I am building a HTPC and wanted this card for it's VIVO and it was cheap.. but this is crazy I might sell this POS ASAP.


Then sell the POS and stop complaining, if you knew what you were doing you would use the classic layout.
 

chinkgai

Diamond Member
Apr 4, 2001
3,904
0
71
Originally posted by: Zstream
Then sell the POS and stop complaining, if you knew what you were doing you would use the classic layout.

uh oh, noob member clownin on elite member...this is gona be good..lol...
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: chinkgai
ccc or classic?

CCC 5.11

And to that guy who said something about complaining.. I personally find this an unacceptable amount of resource overhead from a graphics driver maybe you think it's normal but I've never seen dead OS use above 100MB with any driver(s) I've ever installed.. Including nVidia's forceware/nView whole nine yards. And if you were so smart you'd know Radeon X1K series products not supported by CP alone. ;)
 

Dimmu

Senior member
Jun 24, 2005
890
0
0
Hit Windows key+R and type in msconfig. Then go to the startup tab. Uncheck cli.exe and atiptaxx.exe as you do not need either of them running for the driver to work. Hit apply, and voila! You're problem is fixed!
 

sodcha0s

Golden Member
Jan 7, 2001
1,116
0
0
Yeah you're kinda asking for that using CCC. Personally I think it's all show, I just use classic CP.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,660
6,226
126
Holy crap! You have WinXP running with <100mb of ram? You must've tweaked the crap outta it! :D
 

M0RPH

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,302
1
0
I'm skeptical that it's actually using as much memory as you say BUT, I would recommend you install the drivers only and then ATI Tray Tools, which does everything that the ATI control panels do and has a tiny footprint.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,000
126
Yes, the base ATi driver + ATi Tray Tools is all you need. CCC is bloated garbage.
 

JBT

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
12,094
1
81
If you want as little resources used as possible. Like the other said DO NOT use the CCC use either regular CC or just use ATI Tray tools.