• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ATI All-in-Wonder 9700 Pro review on Anandtech main site

I just wish Anand would use the 9700 in there other reviews instead of the GF4. What gives with that? Every mobo review they do uses the GF still, and that's for gaming too. I know what the GF 4 can do and the differences, and frankly I don't care. I just wonder what's going on with that.
I have read over in the New Articles Forum that the Video card is not the bottleneck, so that's one reason they haven't changed. Just my opinion, but if I'm doing reviews of the best, latest, bleeding edge products, I'm surely going to pull out the best video card I can find. I think ATI deserves this.
And when NV 30 comes out, if that video card is in the "New Reviews" I'm going to be waving a BS flag.

 
Originally posted by: CurtCold
I just wish Anand would use the 9700 in there other reviews instead of the GF4. What gives with that? Every mobo review they do uses the GF still, and that's for gaming too. I know what the GF 4 can do and the differences, and frankly I don't care. I just wonder what's going on with that.
I have read over in the New Articles Forum that the Video card is not the bottleneck, so that's one reason they haven't changed. Just my opinion, but if I'm doing reviews of the best, latest, bleeding edge products, I'm surely going to pull out the best video card I can find. I think ATI deserves this.
And when NV 30 comes out, if that video card is in the "New Reviews" I'm going to be waving a BS flag.

theres something to be said for keeping as much of the testbed the same from review to review
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: CurtCold
I just wish Anand would use the 9700 in there other reviews instead of the GF4. What gives with that? Every mobo review they do uses the GF still, and that's for gaming too. I know what the GF 4 can do and the differences, and frankly I don't care. I just wonder what's going on with that.
I have read over in the New Articles Forum that the Video card is not the bottleneck, so that's one reason they haven't changed. Just my opinion, but if I'm doing reviews of the best, latest, bleeding edge products, I'm surely going to pull out the best video card I can find. I think ATI deserves this.
And when NV 30 comes out, if that video card is in the "New Reviews" I'm going to be waving a BS flag.

theres something to be said for keeping as much of the testbed the same from review to review


Still can ATI get a witness??
 
I can't believe this card is only $50 list more than the vanilla 9700 Pro. Now I'm upset I rushed out and bought the 9700. :| 🙁
 
CurtCold

It has to do with the number of cards we have available; we have far more Ti 4600s to seed our reviewers with than we have Radeon 9700s. With that said however, I will be using the 9700 in a review I'm working on for next week.

Take care,
Anand
 
Originally posted by: Anand Lal Shimpi
CurtCold

It has to do with the number of cards we have available; we have far more Ti 4600s to seed our reviewers with than we have Radeon 9700s. With that said however, I will be using the 9700 in a review I'm working on for next week.

Take care,
Anand

NV30 anyone? Or, Granite Bay/HT P4?
 
Originally posted by: Anand Lal Shimpi
CurtCold

It has to do with the number of cards we have available; we have far more Ti 4600s to seed our reviewers with than we have Radeon 9700s. With that said however, I will be using the 9700 in a review I'm working on for next week.

Take care,
Anand


OMG! yes finally, and from ANAND?? *I'm not worthy, I'm not worthy....dillet didddalleeett....didddalllettt
 
rolleye.gif
 
Back
Top