Athlon X2 10200+

[jimbob200521]

http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/jimbob200521/FastProc.JPG

:Q

btw, this photo was not edited

 

[Lonyo]

Nice background pic.
Care to hook a brother up? (1280x1024 please 😛)

 

[EightySix Four]

it's either A edited, or B a glitch, it says in the namestring it's a 3800+

 

[jimbob200521]

Originally posted by: crazySOB297
it's either A edited, or B a glitch, it says in the namestring it's a 3800+

i assume its a glitch in the program, but i thought it was a pretty cool glitch 🙂

 

[Some1ne]

Yeah, it says socket 754 with a name string of X2 3800+. That alone doesn't make sense, there are no X2's on socket 754.

 

[w00t]

use cpu-z next time 😀 btw change your background lol

 

[rancherlee]

Originally posted by: Some1ne
Yeah, it says socket 754 with a name string of X2 3800+. That alone doesn't make sense, there are no X2's on socket 754.

Not yet anyhow........... even though socket 754 is "Dead" Amd seems to still be trickling down upgrades to the S754 platform, like the "venice" chips that showed up a few weeks back.

 

[imported_goku]

Originally posted by: rancherlee

Originally posted by: Some1ne
Yeah, it says socket 754 with a name string of X2 3800+. That alone doesn't make sense, there are no X2's on socket 754.

Not yet anyhow........... even though socket 754 is "Dead" Amd seems to still be trickling down upgrades to the S754 platform, like the "venice" chips that showed up a few weeks back.

the pin out of 939 is probably required for dual core..

 

[Some1ne]

the pin out of 939 is probably required for dual core..

It's required for the dual-channel memory controller. My understanding was that that was really the only difference between the two sockets. If that's true, then it might at least be technically possible to implement a dual-core CPU on socket 754. Would probably be choked by memory bandwidth during heavy multitasking though.