• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Atari ST versus Amiga

Originally posted by: Fritzo
????? Who cares anymore? Why not start a C-64 VS. Apple II discusion?


because that would be foolish.

Maybe a C64 versus Atari 800xl thread though.

 
Originally posted by: aircooled
Anything Commodore was better than anything Atari during the same generation.

Back away from the crack pipe...slowly...

ST all the way. I had the 1024. I rocked. 😀
 
The C=64 had a dumb frame buffer for video, while the Atari 8-bit had a display list processor that let you change the video mode scanline by scanline, and pull frame buffer information from several locations.

The atari 8-bit engineers were the ones who went to Commodore to design the Amiga, while the old CEO of Commodore went to Atari to build the ST as a 16-bit C=64.

So:
Atari 8 bit > Commodore 8 bit
Commodore 16-bit (with Atari engineers) > Atari 16 bit (with Jack Trameil from Commodore running Atari)

(From a programming and technical standpoint, though in terms of sales I believe the C=64 and ST won.)
 
Back
Top