Good luck on getting honest answers. I'll vote for Romney as the lesser of 2 evils.Out of curiosity i m starting a thread or rather a poll to check
the political sensitivity of this forum.
So for which candidate are you going to vote for ?...
Well , the choices are not public , it should help.....Good luck on getting honest answers. I'll vote for Romney as the lesser of 2 evils.
Yet i cAnt tell wich one is the most meddle class friendlyI'm middle class and I vote for the person who most represents my interests, financially speaking.
Is Connecticut some kind of heaven where all things are going well .??..I live in Connecticut. I don't need to vote.
Neither of them are.Yet i cAnt tell wich one is the most meddle class friendly
seen from the US citizen POV...
The sample is still not significant enough but it s quiteThis forum is 70% Democrat so any vote we have here will usually reflect that.
Either you are favouring the poorest people or the eliteNeither of them are.
Johnson
I wondered who is this guy , i didnt know that there sJohnson
Yes , that s true but i saw the mistake too late to correct the thing..BTW, your poll is missing the option for those who wish to vote for someone else than those two, like an independent candidate.
I dont think radical is the right term. I think stupid, out of touch, idiots, useless are much better adjectives.Obama, by a long shot. Romney embraced the radical wing of the GOP, even going so far as to pick Ryan as his running mate. No thanks. I probably would have been okay with Huntsman or Romer, but the rest of the GOP candidates including Romney are too radical for my tastes.
A vote for the two party system is a vote for the status quo and all that concentrated centralized unchecked power without normalized regulations as the main course.anyone but the ones from the two party system
You might need to vote for Murphy, though McMahon got owned in the debate today, so maybe not.I live in Connecticut. I don't need to vote.