K1052
Elite Member
- Aug 21, 2003
- 47,877
- 36,870
- 136
Yes, I know. They knew exactly what they were doing when they did this. Those people are going to have to live somewhere, and somewhere is not where they've torn down their current residences.
Yep, I'm in one of them (far south suburb).
Well, when you tear down slums and build $500k condos, it makes it hard for the original slum residents to move back in. You are very right, it is a reverse great migration, and it's working exactly as designed. Chicago gets to clean itself up, and get more income it so desperately needs (note: it never has enough income), with less responsibilities (although Crook Co. doesn't really lose those responsibilities much), and the rest of the suburbs get F'd with what were Chicago's problem(s). <fade out with Rahm telling us how good of a job he's doing...>
Most CHA housing was in deplorable condition, also they were starting to empty somewhat on their own accord due to factors I mentioned. The housing crash and credit market seizing up was poorly timed which stopped the rebuilding in a lot of places, some of this has gotten underway again. I don't really ascribe this situation to a master plan to get rid of black people. More like inadequate planning and bad timing.
The CHA properties can only be developed at certain ratios of affordability. They can't legally plop down a full market rate complex on CHA land or sell that land to developers who will. Mixed income developments are the order of the day and have seemed to work reasonably well where they've done it.
Daley probably should have retired before his last term. He made a lot of deals to buy time and labor peace that were not sustainable. I have a hard time being mad at Rahm for trying to clean up a mess that he didn't make.
