A real geek wouldn't pay 2x premium for outdated tech.
Yeah, because you can get lithium polymer batteries in other laptops that don't end up more expensive (actually what laptops with comparable power have anywhere close to the battery life, let alone in a comparable package?). And sorry, but since Asus' bread and butter is the Eee, your argument goes completely flat. Yay, we need yet another slightly revised shitty Atom based netbook. I'm not even an Apple fan, but by all means, explain all this outdated tech, you know the same stuff that all the other companies are currently using too. The only three things that come to mind is i7 (which will likely show up here in about a month), Blu-Ray and RGB-LED based display (of which, only Dell offers it as an option on the Studio 16 which has many shortcoming compared to a 15 or 17 inch Macbook Pro). You could argue you can't buy as good of graphics chips, which I completely agree, although I have to wonder what you're doing gaming on laptops (most have pretty damn bad displays that even cheap TN based monitors best easily). I'm not even arguing that you do pay a premium, as you do (although you do get a premium laptop for the most part so its pretty fair).
Plenty of geeks use Macs. In fact, check the people who are professional geeks (tech bloggers for instance) and plenty use Macs. MacOSX is actually very good for geeks. I don't use high (or low depending on your view) level tools, but I'm not a complete noob either, which is why Windows fits me better.
But let's not turn this into yet another tired Apple argument.