Hi all, I'm having a tough time deciding between two notebooks. I'm looking for something light, portable, sufficiently powerful for productivity tasks (including web browsing, MS Office Suite, Mathematica/Matlab/Maple, AntiVirus applications, FTP clients, etc., but there's no gaming requirement.
These two notebooks stand out because they are 1) <4lbs, putting them in a significantly different usage category for me than the huge number of 5lb notebooks, 2) affordable, 3) are more than acceptable as actual primary work computers, despite their prices and diminutive size. 4) while they carry the usual 1366x768 resolution, the 13.3" screen size I think will give that a sufficient dpi to make me happy. I'm currently using a 4 year old Lenovo T61p that has 1280x1024 resolution, and man do I appreciate the additional real estate (in the 15.6" screen), but I understand that that'll be tricky to find these days.
Here's how they stack relative to one another, note that the -X1 and -P35 are quite important (note the U35 does NOT have a dedicated graphics card, which I definitely don't need):
In either one I will throw an SSD in, although I may wait for Intel and OCZ's new families
U35-X1:
R705-P35:
Basically they are very similar computers, so here's the dilemma:
- purely in specs, the R705 is the way to go, its as light as a macbook air, and having handled it (I've never gotten my hands on the U35-X1), it's a real pleasure to pick it up and manipulate it: at 3.2lbs it is easy to wip out and use like a netbook in a way a 5lb notebook is slightly more limited (e.g. the U43 or the N82-Jq are both light for their size, but they still feel like notebooks). It's also $40 cheaper.
- I'm not sure about Toshiba however. I've had great experiences with Asus in both notebooks and components, so I'm always partial to their products.
So I'm really looking for anyone with personal experience with either of these notebooks that can testify to their relative qualities.
Of course the alternative is wait for Sandy Bridge to roll out and then wait for sandy bridge notebooks to get cheap and light, maybe by next January (I can wait with my current notebook). I'm hesitant to go that route, however, because 1) I don't need graphics ability, so even while Sandy Bridge may revolution mobile graphics computing I don't know how much it would effect my real-world performance requirements over the next five years. 2) I don't see why sandy-bridge notebooks would be lighter than these, so waiting a year may basically get me the same laptop at the same price but with better graphics power.
Thanks for any input,
Darunium
p.s. I'd love an i5 option, but I haven't found any notebooks at this weight and this price range with an i5 processor, and I don't think that an extra $250 is worth the relative performance increase an i5 grants.
These two notebooks stand out because they are 1) <4lbs, putting them in a significantly different usage category for me than the huge number of 5lb notebooks, 2) affordable, 3) are more than acceptable as actual primary work computers, despite their prices and diminutive size. 4) while they carry the usual 1366x768 resolution, the 13.3" screen size I think will give that a sufficient dpi to make me happy. I'm currently using a 4 year old Lenovo T61p that has 1280x1024 resolution, and man do I appreciate the additional real estate (in the 15.6" screen), but I understand that that'll be tricky to find these days.
Here's how they stack relative to one another, note that the -X1 and -P35 are quite important (note the U35 does NOT have a dedicated graphics card, which I definitely don't need):
In either one I will throw an SSD in, although I may wait for Intel and OCZ's new families
U35-X1:
3.7lb
$740
1366x768 resolution in a 13.3" screen
i3-370M
4GB of RAM (idk the timings but I doubt I'd need to replace it)
R705-P35:
3.2lb
$700 (local retailer)
1366x768 resolution in a 13.3" screen
i3-370M
4GB of RAM (idk the timings but I doubt I'd need to replace it)
Basically they are very similar computers, so here's the dilemma:
- purely in specs, the R705 is the way to go, its as light as a macbook air, and having handled it (I've never gotten my hands on the U35-X1), it's a real pleasure to pick it up and manipulate it: at 3.2lbs it is easy to wip out and use like a netbook in a way a 5lb notebook is slightly more limited (e.g. the U43 or the N82-Jq are both light for their size, but they still feel like notebooks). It's also $40 cheaper.
- I'm not sure about Toshiba however. I've had great experiences with Asus in both notebooks and components, so I'm always partial to their products.
So I'm really looking for anyone with personal experience with either of these notebooks that can testify to their relative qualities.
Of course the alternative is wait for Sandy Bridge to roll out and then wait for sandy bridge notebooks to get cheap and light, maybe by next January (I can wait with my current notebook). I'm hesitant to go that route, however, because 1) I don't need graphics ability, so even while Sandy Bridge may revolution mobile graphics computing I don't know how much it would effect my real-world performance requirements over the next five years. 2) I don't see why sandy-bridge notebooks would be lighter than these, so waiting a year may basically get me the same laptop at the same price but with better graphics power.
Thanks for any input,
Darunium
p.s. I'd love an i5 option, but I haven't found any notebooks at this weight and this price range with an i5 processor, and I don't think that an extra $250 is worth the relative performance increase an i5 grants.