- Apr 7, 2012
- 144
- 0
- 76
The N66U is the king of 802.11n routers, but considering how this router will be used I'm not certain it's advantages justify the price difference. Chiefly this will be used for gaming on a PS4/PC, and it will also sometimes do double duty as a media router. Here is a hardware.info spec sheet comparison breakdown:
http://us.hardware.info/comparisontable/products/157249-130513
Obviously the greatest difference between the two is the bandwidth of 450Mbps vs. 300Mbps, but I would never broadcast anything that would require anywhere close to either. I understand that this is a theoretical number, and that actual data rates and effective range vary massively between many routers claiming the same numbers. The TV to which this will broadcast is a good 50-60 feet away, and through several walls. The hardware.info sheet above actually lists actually tested data rates, and there you can see the superiority of the Asus. However, here's my thought. Considering the price difference I realized I would be able to buy the TP-Link and their TL-WA850RE range extender. I'm thinking this might actually flip the race and give the TP-Link a stronger effective data rate, and still win the price war ($115 vs. $71).
Otherwise, the greatest advantage of the Asus appears to be the ability to host a VPN server (not a business router, won't use this), and to provide the ability to assign bandwidth to QoS by Mac Address (which shouldn't be an issue because no other devices will be interfering with gaming on this network).
What am I missing? Anything relevant to gaming or basic local media server broadcasting? Could one expect to see any sort of substantial performance difference in gaming (such as lag) on an identical ISP or anything else that can't be put down on a spec sheet? I've heard how great the custom firmware is, but so long as I can achieve a NAT Type 2 I don't really care about spending my days customizing router settings.
Thanks.
http://us.hardware.info/comparisontable/products/157249-130513
Obviously the greatest difference between the two is the bandwidth of 450Mbps vs. 300Mbps, but I would never broadcast anything that would require anywhere close to either. I understand that this is a theoretical number, and that actual data rates and effective range vary massively between many routers claiming the same numbers. The TV to which this will broadcast is a good 50-60 feet away, and through several walls. The hardware.info sheet above actually lists actually tested data rates, and there you can see the superiority of the Asus. However, here's my thought. Considering the price difference I realized I would be able to buy the TP-Link and their TL-WA850RE range extender. I'm thinking this might actually flip the race and give the TP-Link a stronger effective data rate, and still win the price war ($115 vs. $71).
Otherwise, the greatest advantage of the Asus appears to be the ability to host a VPN server (not a business router, won't use this), and to provide the ability to assign bandwidth to QoS by Mac Address (which shouldn't be an issue because no other devices will be interfering with gaming on this network).
What am I missing? Anything relevant to gaming or basic local media server broadcasting? Could one expect to see any sort of substantial performance difference in gaming (such as lag) on an identical ISP or anything else that can't be put down on a spec sheet? I've heard how great the custom firmware is, but so long as I can achieve a NAT Type 2 I don't really care about spending my days customizing router settings.
Thanks.