The funniest thing is, which actually tells the most about his character: tuned at gaming 🤣🤣🤣I didn't know Piednol worked in Haifa.
NOBODY EVER tuned ANYTHING for gaming at Intel when designing an uarch.
The funniest thing is, which actually tells the most about his character: tuned at gaming 🤣🤣🤣I didn't know Piednol worked in Haifa.
He didn't said that.The funniest thing is, which actually tells the most about his character: tuned at gaming 🤣🤣🤣
NOBODY EVER tuned ANYTHING for gaming at Intel when designing an uarch.
You either speak even worse English than him, or you just follow him for so long that you can read his mind. What he wrote does not mean what you state now, at least not in English.He didn't said that.
He said that skylake was "tuned", but without specifying for what, and one of the results is the performance in gaming.
Yes, my english is bad, but still.You either speak even worse English than him, or you just follow him for so long that you can read his mind. What he wrote does not mean what you state now, at least not in English.
You take David Kanter seriously?It's best not to take Francois too seriously in any case.
Well , IPC is application depended. ZEN 2 may have higher IPC in Floating Point in Cinebench but that doesnt actually mean it has the higher IPC in general.You take David Kanter seriously?
@FPiednoel Isn’t AMD better right now in IPC? Tweet added by Fr3dweiser @fr3dweiser | Twuko
Tweet added by Fr3dweiser @fr3dweiser @FPiednoel Isn’t AMD better right now in IPC? | Twukowww.twipu.com
Remember we're talking Renoir vs. Intel mobile chips specifically. You can't just compare Zen2 to Coffeelake on desktop and come to a conclusion. In mobile, you've got to normalize for power (I guess?) for things to be meaningful. Unless it's okay for Intel to win benchmarks by burning up 2x more package power.Well , IPC is application depended.
I have a ton of respect for David Kanter and his knowledge of digital IP design far outweighs mine. With that said, appeal to authority doesn't go very far with me so without an argument with data to back it up, a simple no response is meaningless to me.You take David Kanter seriously?
@FPiednoel Isn’t AMD better right now in IPC? Tweet added by Fr3dweiser @fr3dweiser | Twuko
Tweet added by Fr3dweiser @fr3dweiser @FPiednoel Isn’t AMD better right now in IPC? | Twukowww.twipu.com
The question was about IPC though, so he's right. Ice Lake is ahead in IPC.I have a ton of respect for David Kanter and his knowledge of digital IP design far outweighs mine. With that said, appeal to authority doesn't go very far with me so without an argument with data to back it up, a simple no response is meaningless to me.
Now, from what I've seen, he is correct in terms of Icelake, but Icelake also doesn't have any skus with more than 4 cores, doesn't scale well in frequency compared to AMD or intel's own 14 nm, and doesn't seem to offer any significant power savings to speak of compared to intel 14 nm, so it's hard to mark that one in the win column.
IPC will be almost the same in desktop vs mobile.Remember we're talking Renoir vs. Intel mobile chips specifically. You can't just compare Zen2 to Coffeelake on desktop and come to a conclusion. In mobile, you've got to normalize for power (I guess?) for things to be meaningful. Unless it's okay for Intel to win benchmarks by burning up 2x more package power.
At what applications ??The question was about IPC though, so he's right. Ice Lake is ahead in IPC.
It may be littered with other problems, but if you're gonna talk about IPC, then currently in x86 Intel is still technically in the lead.
We'll see if that holds up later this year though.
Not necessarily! Renoir has a reworked die design. Cache latency and memory latency may be different.IPC will be almost the same in desktop vs mobile.
On average of a multiple applications. I dunno, if you want an industry standard or something use Spec results, they'll tell you the same thing. Sunny Cove is ahead of Zen 2 and Skylake.At what applications ??
My point is that when your perf/clock lead is with a chip that is mobile only with a limited number of SKUs, it's not exactly a win. AMD has the perf/clock lead in desktop, server, and mobile above 4 cores. Intel has a lead in mobile 4 cores and below where it still loses in overall performance and efficiency. So who has the "IPC lead"? It's not a straight forward decision at this particular point in time.The question was about IPC though, so he's right. Ice Lake is ahead in IPC.
It may be littered with other problems, but if you're gonna talk about IPC, then currently in x86 Intel is still technically in the lead.
We'll see if that holds up later this year though.
Comparing Icelake with Intel's 14nm CPUs or Zen 2 in desktop performance right now is like comparing Apple's A13 with Intel's 14nm CPUs or Zen 2 in desktop performance! lolNow, from what I've seen, he is correct in terms of Icelake, but Icelake also doesn't have any skus with more than 4 cores, doesn't scale well in frequency compared to AMD or intel's own 14 nm
Yea ok there will be a small difference.Not necessarily! Renoir has a reworked die design. Cache latency and memory latency may be different.
Yes ok, what are those applications ?? do you have a link with results from those applications ??On average of a multiple applications. I dunno, if you want an industry standard or something use Spec results, they'll tell you the same thing. Sunny Cove is ahead of Zen 2 and Skylake.
SPEC itself is a bunch of different "applications".Yes ok, what are those applications ?? do you have a link with results from those applications ??
We have links of Spec int and Spec float in a single thread at a given clock speed for ZEN 2 vs Ice Lake ??SPEC itself is a bunch of different "applications".
Not single thread and not at fixed clock speeds as Andrei has repeatedly said that its not relevant, but here you go:We have links of Spec int and Spec float in a single thread at a given clock speed for ZEN 2 vs Ice Lake ??
nice thxNot single thread and not at fixed clock speeds as Andrei has repeatedly said that its not relevant, but here you go:
As you can see from the final graph in that page Ice Lake is ~10% ahead in PPC vs Zen 2 in int and ~13% ahead in fp.![]()
The Ice Lake Benchmark Preview: Inside Intel's 10nm
www.anandtech.com
Yes, it is single thread as in its the result for a single instance of the rate benchmark(hence rate_1).this is not single thread ??
Nice, we have a winner thenYes, it is single thread as in its the result for a single instance of the rate benchmark(hence rate_1).