Yet the 45W 4800H still performed better (possibly boosting at even higher wattage for a short while?)
Anyway, that behaviour is quite similar to how Intel CPUs operate and it's not like the 15W 4800U running in lenovo 25W chassis is performing that much worse:
Yeah i love how that functions cause with luck most things you do will certainly be done in 150 seconds. Not a bad way honestly to handle things. Good job AMD.Boosting algo for the G14 is as follows:
65W for 10 seconds.
54W for 150 seconds.
35W indefinitely.
Check Hardware's Unboxed's review for this:
| Modus | CPU Package Power (permanent) | CPU Package Power (peak) | Frequency (permanent, ca.) | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asus Zephyrus G14 „Silent“ | 25 Watt | 50 Watt | 2,95 GHz | 31–38 dB |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 „Silent“ (on battery) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt | 2,40 GHz | 31–33 dB |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 „Performance“ | 35 Watt | 65 Watt | 3,25 GHz | 31–44 dB |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 „Performance“ (on battery) | 20 Watt | 25 Watt | 2,90 GHz | 31–37 dB |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 „Turbo“ | 35 Watt | 65 Watt | 3,25 GHz | 37–45 dB |
I remember the fiasco well. My two points were: It's easy to ignore Toms since there are plenty reviews to choose from anyway. And the blame for the unprofessional handling of said fiasco is down to its author Luke Hill. Toms review of the ROG Zephyrus G14 is by Andrew Freedman, after a quick look across his articles he seemed fine.I don't know if you remember that fiasco but yeah they went out of their ways to call HWUB trolls when the dude over there asked for a meeting, that is beyond disrespectful. He simply wanted to meetup and compare data cause obviously something was way off given Toms was the outlier while the rest of the people found similar issues with cheap motherboards.As someone about to buy a B450 and prob 3900x/4900x before end of year, if i listened to Toms i would be on one heck of a flakey motherboard instead of settling on a B450 Tomahawk Max. That one has been proven at least.
I will buy whatever HWUB sells before Toms, they did out of the case and in the case testing, they went up and above the call of duty with their testing. Heck i will buy TPU before Toms.
Edit: Yeah here is the video where he calls Toms out. Yeah NEVER again.
The worthy opponent to that 9980HK in a monster package will be 3950X in a monster package, lol.
Depends, I'm not sure how they have Renoir set up. On desktop, all the 105W TDP CPUs can boost up to 142W, and I've seen my 3900x sustain that power draw easily. It really never goes any higher than that. Mobile is going to be different, and it'll be limited by cooling solution. That Asus lappie is not going to offer thermal limits when the GPU is out of use.
That IS pretty damn good. Realistically-speaking, most benches/workloads are going to be finished in under 150s (especially on a laptop) so I don't expect it to sit there too often.
The 4800HS can mantain 1600mhz for Vega7 that puts it between margin of error of a desktop 3200G at 1600mhz, witch is impressive to say at least.
Margins are probably lower on the mobile parts. Also, Matisse is like Rome's toenail clippings. Once you have Rome, it's easy enough to cobble together Matisse for the desktop crowd. Renoir obviously re-uses the same IP, but design-wise it's much more involved.
from Anandtech article:
135 W & 50Aand here is the TDP of Comet lake cpus for comparison. suddenly brief 65w bursts on renoir don't seem so bad?
from Anandtech article:
Intel Details 10th Gen Comet Lake-H for 45 W Notebooks: Up to 5.3 GHz*
www.anandtech.com
True desktop replacements has been utilizing non-mobile CPUs successfully for years. These CML-H i9 CPUs don't make even a tiny bit of sense.
They only last 10 seconds, too. 56 seconds @ 135W? Please. Intel wants to win some benchmarks.
Facebook
Twitter