Guys I have a Venice 3200+ that I haven't really overclocked yet as I intend to get a Opteron 144 once they are readily available. I was messing around just to get ready for it and I dropped the multiplier on my Venice to keep it near stock speeds, dropped memory and HT multipliers and locked the PCI-E and PCI buses and I went to town on the HT frequency.
I was able to get at least 340 on it from 200 stock before I stopped going higher. Now if at least 340 is stable with the Venice in spec, then the mobo should be able to get around that when I overclock the Opteron right?
Reason I ask is, a lot of the early reviews pointed out this wasn't a very overclocking friendly board. Of course VCore is limited to 1.55 and many of the DFI's features are missing - but 340+ on the HT bus basically means I can overclock any chip to its max (at 1.55V or less) right given I keep the RAM near stock and the PCI-E and PCI busses locked?
This will affect my decision on if I should get the 144 with the 9x and go for 2.8 or pay more for the 10x of the 146.
Thanks all!
I was able to get at least 340 on it from 200 stock before I stopped going higher. Now if at least 340 is stable with the Venice in spec, then the mobo should be able to get around that when I overclock the Opteron right?
Reason I ask is, a lot of the early reviews pointed out this wasn't a very overclocking friendly board. Of course VCore is limited to 1.55 and many of the DFI's features are missing - but 340+ on the HT bus basically means I can overclock any chip to its max (at 1.55V or less) right given I keep the RAM near stock and the PCI-E and PCI busses locked?
This will affect my decision on if I should get the 144 with the 9x and go for 2.8 or pay more for the 10x of the 146.
Thanks all!