Assuming we haven't destroyed ourselves, our ANCESTORS will have no nice buildings/landmarks to look at in 500 years.

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Stonehenge, pyramids, castles, the great wall of china, the leaning tower of pisa, the colloseum. What do these have in common? They've lasted. What buildings/land marks are we building today that will last for hundreds of years? The statue of liberty might make it (although, unlike those other ones mentioned it will require constant attention to keep going). But you go to any of our cities now or houses and everything is temporary. Structures are so disposable now, and it makes me sad.
 

Yo Ma Ma

Lifer
Jan 21, 2000
11,635
2
0
Mr. Rushmore & Chief Crazy Horse monuments should last awhile... but building-wise there aren't many that will make it.
 

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Aug 24, 2001
31,796
2
0
I'd think most of the monuments in D.C. would survive....barring a nuclear explosion.
 

J0hnny

Platinum Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,366
0
0
Actually, you don't have to worry. Catholic churches will still be around for centuries.
 

Doboji

Diamond Member
May 18, 2001
7,912
0
76
You're wrong we have plenty of buildings that will stand the test of time....

The Pentagon
The Statue of Liberty
The Seattle Space Needle
The Hoover Dam
The Stardust

Need I go on?

Cheer up Skoorb!!!

-Max
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,758
602
126
I find the fact that our plethora of strip malls and McDonalds will have collapsed within 500 years refreshing myself.
 

hevnsnt

Lifer
Mar 18, 2000
10,868
1
0
How about:

"Stonehenge, pyramids, castles, the great wall of china, the leaning tower of pisa, the colloseum"
 

globalcitizen

Senior member
Sep 6, 2004
954
0
0
Dont worry. I will build a massive monument when I am ruler of the world. Oh btw, title should say "descendents" not "ancestors".:D
 

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
http://www.ravanica.com/archit.htm

The building started in 1965, and is built structurally to last 1,000 years. The pews seating capacity is 622. The choir loft holds 150 people. The church is fireproofed and air-conditioned.

It contains 160 tons of steel, 1,100 tons of stone, 2,240 tons of concrete and 1,000 tons of plaster, lath, roofing, etc.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Doboji
You're wrong we have plenty of buildings that will stand the test of time....

The Pentagon
The Statue of Liberty
The Seattle Space Needle
The Hoover Dam
The Stardust

Need I go on?

Cheer up Skoorb!!!

-Max
Most of those are only because we _need_ them, not because they'll last simply sitting there. They need constant maintenance.
How about:

"Stonehenge, pyramids, castles, the great wall of china, the leaning tower of pisa, the colloseum"
Nothing from our time. Now stop being naughty.
Ancestors? You think there will be time travel in 500 years?
Damn, nobody else caught it!

 

freebee

Diamond Member
Dec 30, 2000
4,043
0
0
People back then were stupid. Wasted a tremendous amount of resources, overbuilt, over engineered, and over designed architecture that outlived their useful purpose.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: freebee
People back then were stupid. Wasted a tremendous amount of resources, overbuilt, over engineered, and over designed architecture that outlived their useful purpose.
True, but the buildings were still cool.

 

J0hnny

Platinum Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,366
0
0
Originally posted by: freebee
People back then were stupid. Wasted a tremendous amount of resources, overbuilt, over engineered, and over designed architecture that outlived their useful purpose.

Yup, think about the countless lives that it took to build the pyramids and the great wall. If only we could still have slave labor today to build such grand monuments!
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
I have decided to raise enough money for Skoorbhenge. It will be erected at the tip of the world and be similar in proportions to stone henge, but on a scale 70 times larger. It will be placed on a massive iceberg and will as such be able to tour the world every two years, so that everybody can behold it.
 

Doboji

Diamond Member
May 18, 2001
7,912
0
76
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I have decided to raise enough money for Skoorbhenge. It will be erected at the tip of the world and be similar in proportions to stone henge, but on a scale 70 times larger. It will be placed on a massive iceberg and will as such be able to tour the world every two years, so that everybody can behold it.


I'm in... put the 500 ft Statue of Dob in the middle holding a mighty sword with OMGWTFBBQ inscribed on the blade.

:thumbsup:

-Max

 

globalcitizen

Senior member
Sep 6, 2004
954
0
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I have decided to raise enough money for Skoorbhenge. It will be erected at the tip of the world and be similar in proportions to stone henge, but on a scale 70 times larger. It will be placed on a massive iceberg and will as such be able to tour the world every two years, so that everybody can behold it.

But be careful of global warming. Skoorbhenge might sink.:laugh:
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,850
4,956
136
Assuming we haven't destroyed ourselves, our ancestors will have no nice buildings/landmarks to look at in 500 years.



Uh...

Ancestors are those who came BEFORE us.


I think that's why Bryophyte asked about a time machine


;)



edit. I guess it's been noted.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: globalcitizen
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I have decided to raise enough money for Skoorbhenge. It will be erected at the tip of the world and be similar in proportions to stone henge, but on a scale 70 times larger. It will be placed on a massive iceberg and will as such be able to tour the world every two years, so that everybody can behold it.

But be careful of global warming. Skoorbhenge might sink.:laugh:
Then I shall raise its mammoth stone blocks from the ocean and erect it elsewhere!
 

rahvin

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,475
1
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Stonehenge, pyramids, castles, the great wall of china, the leaning tower of pisa, the colloseum. What do these have in common? They've lasted. What buildings/land marks are we building today that will last for hundreds of years? The statue of liberty might make it (although, unlike those other ones mentioned it will require constant attention to keep going). But you go to any of our cities now or houses and everything is temporary. Structures are so disposable now, and it makes me sad.

Hoover dam will last tens of thousands of years. Most of the interstates will remain in place for probably a thousand years and our largest open pit mines will be permanent geographic features. Instead of looking at things made of wood and steel you should be looking around your world for things made of dirt, stone and concrete. Items constructed of those materials will probably outlast humanity.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: feralkid
Assuming we haven't destroyed ourselves, our ancestors will have no nice buildings/landmarks to look at in 500 years.



Uh...

Ancestors are those who came BEFORE us.


I think that's why Bryophyte asked about a time machine
Yes, I got that bit ;)

 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
Originally posted by: globalcitizen
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I have decided to raise enough money for Skoorbhenge. It will be erected at the tip of the world and be similar in proportions to stone henge, but on a scale 70 times larger. It will be placed on a massive iceberg and will as such be able to tour the world every two years, so that everybody can behold it.

But be careful of global warming. Skoorbhenge might sink.:laugh:

:p;):D
 

Mo0o

Lifer
Jul 31, 2001
24,227
3
76
How about the huge ass mine in utah? I forgot the name of it but taht thing is massive
 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: feralkid
Assuming we haven't destroyed ourselves, our ancestors will have no nice buildings/landmarks to look at in 500 years.



Uh...

Ancestors are those who came BEFORE us.


I think that's why Bryophyte asked about a time machine
Yes, I got that bit ;)

yet you refuse to correct it :p