Originally posted by: LilBlinbBlahIce
Yeah but you can't deny the possible outcomes can you? Easy to dismiss something you have no answer for as BS, you're a master at it.Originally posted by: etech
The BS is strong with this one.Originally posted by: LilBlinbBlahIce
I can see why you like that. In scenario one, the Pals try to reign in terrorists by force, start a civil war and basically destroy themselves. In the second scenario, the onus of security shifts from Israel to Jordon or Egypt. If one of them does not go out of its way to protect Israel, Israel can launch a "defensive" attack and use its overwhelming military superiority to destroy either country. Either way Israel wins and more Arabs die, a NeoCon's wet dream.Originally posted by: Dari
So long as abbas and/or arafat refuse to reign in the terrorists and disarm them, then israel has no choice but to continue to build the fence. If abbas is afraid to stop terrorists from coming to israel and blowing themselves up, all in the vain hope of averting a palestinian civil war, then the fence should be built to stop the terrorists. Fencing off Gaza worked perfectly. Now it's the West Bank's time.
Hell, if the terrorists continue to call the shots in the Palestinian circle, then I see no problem with either annexing the whole damn territory or giving it back to Jordan and Egypt so they can do israel's dirty work.
The BS is your saying that dead Arabs is a NeoCon's wet dream. Pure BS on your part. It was also inflammatory, unnecessary and could also be called a flat out lie. Take your pick. But hey, do your best to stir up anti-American hatred by the Arabs. They won?t do anything about it, except fly a plane or two or three into buildings. Is that really what you want?