- Dec 11, 2004
- 477
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: gamerj
ok, here we go....SLI already exists about 10 years...only reason Nvidia can brag about it is because they bought voodoo and with that the patent on "SLI" ... wow impressive...
Its pretty obvious that ati is leader now, especially when u compare the X800XT with that ridiculous 6800 card....(lol,, just kidding, great card)...but come on, 150 watts? twice the size? half the performance lol...
ati wins again...(ive never flamed before, how am i doing?)
Originally posted by: gamerj
whoops. wrong poste , should read link first haha....well bla,
deleted original post...made no sense whaha
Dont want to start anything not related to the subject oops.........(delete quote sonic ice? or did i just start something that i can no longer take back muhahahaha)
j/k, im just bored
Originally posted by: Edward Lee
WHAT U GOTTA SAY NOW?
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2315
Originally posted by: Edward Lee
Here's my take on the whole scenerio....
SLI is a waste of resources. What was said is true, it is more of a novelty than anything else.
Dual core is another quick and cheap way for companies to increase graphic performance and recycle their old technology just like SLI. But it is more efficient in its use of resources (1 card instead of 2 cards) and has better bench marks.
For those of you who bought or considered buying SLI because you thought it was the "end all" for future upgrades think again. You're buying a recycled repackaged product.
Originally posted by: beany323
Hello, first timer here...
was thinking of getting a (newer) computer from cyberpower and saw sli...thought hmmm...did a search and found this site!! (nice btw) anyway, i was thinking ok that sounds ok..2 video cards..(i was considering what the heck to gt ultra's) but was reading and might have to reconsider... going to go with PCIe for sure...ati card..(not sure still) but just wanted to say thanks for the warning, you probably saved me at least a 1k....
thanks!
Originally posted by: Lonyo
SLI still such with mid range cards whichever way you look at it.
There is no way you can say that dual 6600GT's is worthwhile.
And I will argue with anyone who wants to disagree, and prove myself right![]()
Originally posted by: Regs
Originally posted by: beany323
Hello, first timer here...
was thinking of getting a (newer) computer from cyberpower and saw sli...thought hmmm...did a search and found this site!! (nice btw) anyway, i was thinking ok that sounds ok..2 video cards..(i was considering what the heck to gt ultra's) but was reading and might have to reconsider... going to go with PCIe for sure...ati card..(not sure still) but just wanted to say thanks for the warning, you probably saved me at least a 1k....
thanks!
This is just the dual core sli solution. Dual 6800Ultras in SLI is a big difference. If you have the money, get it. Just make sure you get a nice 600watt Power Supply Unit with it.
Originally posted by: magomago
don't bother raid zero...total waste of time and little to negligble preformance increase. if SLI is a novelty, then RAID is....novelty^2
If you are going FX55, unless you plan on wanting extra overclock via the unlocked multiplier, you maybe better off purchasing a 4000+ as they are the SAME thing without the unlcoked multiplier. Also if you won't overclock, there is no need for extra "ultra ll black blue special edition EB Hyper Balistix with LCD lights to say it is working!" kind of memoryGood old value ram will run fine on stock...but it would be a sad thing to pair a FX55 with value ram
And that FX55 will slaughter that P4. If you are into high end gaming right now, Its hard to go Intel instead. Even the Bastion of videoencoding is much much closer, and depends on the specific application you are using~
You make the stupidest analogies I've EVER seen. It amazes me how you can keep coming up with dumber and dumber analogies. It's like your brain is made to do one thing, pump out stupidity. AMAZING!Originally posted by: Edward Lee
I don't like grapes... Just to make my stand on this clearer, I'm indifferent to Dual Core Graphic Processors. (I actually think it's a neat idea) But I think SLI is stupid. SLI is like putting 4 wheels on a motorcycle and calling it a car.
Originally posted by: magomago
don't bother raid zero...total waste of time and little to negligble preformance increase. if SLI is a novelty, then RAID is....novelty^2
If you are going FX55, unless you plan on wanting extra overclock via the unlocked multiplier, you maybe better off purchasing a 4000+ as they are the SAME thing without the unlcoked multiplier. Also if you won't overclock, there is no need for extra "ultra ll black blue special edition EB Hyper Balistix with LCD lights to say it is working!" kind of memoryGood old value ram will run fine on stock...but it would be a sad thing to pair a FX55 with value ram
And that FX55 will slaughter that P4. If you are into high end gaming right now, Its hard to go Intel instead. Even the Bastion of videoencoding is much much closer, and depends on the specific application you are using~
Originally posted by: Edward Lee
Here's my take on the whole scenerio....
SLI is a waste of resources. What was said is true, it is more of a novelty than anything else.
Dual core is another quick and cheap way for companies to increase graphic performance and recycle their old technology just like SLI. But it is more efficient in its use of resources (1 card instead of 2 cards and need for only 1 pci-e slot as opposed to 2) and has shown better bench marks.
For those of you who bought or considered buying SLI because you thought it was the "end all" for future upgrades think again. You may be improving your performance now, but ultimately you're buying a recycled repackaged product.
