Aren't the Bourne Movies Great?

Jadow

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2003
5,962
2
0
God what fun movies, they keep you entertained and on the edge of your seat all the way through.

Best action movie series of decade.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
First one was. After that they were complete crap because of the ass photography they used. Unwatchable in the extreme. Complete waste of some of the best books I've read.
 
Jun 4, 2005
19,723
1
0
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
First one was. After that they were complete crap because of the ass photography they used. Unwatchable in the extreme. Complete waste of some of the best books I've read.

They're only loosely based on the books.

As for the movies themselves, I thought they were great, assuming you have an attention span greater than that of a 10 year old.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
First one was. After that they were complete crap because of the ass photography they used. Unwatchable in the extreme. Complete waste of some of the best books I've read.

The first one was great. The second one... not so much. The third one was awesome.
 

sniperruff

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
11,644
2
0
i love all three of them.

i like matt damon too.

but yes i agree that the camera-work is done to conceal the fact that jason borne is not as kick-ass as we imagine him to be.
 

Jadow

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2003
5,962
2
0
I really liked Shooter as well!

As for the camera work in Bourne usually I'm the first one to hate the hand cam, but for some reason, I just don't mind it in Bourne.
 

Newfie

Senior member
Jun 15, 2005
817
0
76
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
First one was. After that they were complete crap because of the ass photography they used. Unwatchable in the extreme. Complete waste of some of the best books I've read.

I have to agree that the shaky cam stuff was a bit overdone, but in the end I did enjoy the movies.
 

Nikamichi

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2003
7,759
0
0
Shaky cam was overdone, but it did not ruin the movie experience at all.

Another :thumbsup: for Shooter, but it really wasn't on the same plane as Bourne.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Actually, I haven't seen any of the Bourne movies.

neither have I. Was starting to watch the first one one day, but for some reason I had no motivation to actually pay attentio and my mind was tired, so I gave up and watched some comedy. Next time I tried was with a group of friends, and all of us decided after about 15 minutes, that we'd rather watch Team America. lol

I do want to watch it, but it has to be when I'm alone or with someone else who really wants to watch them. They look great but I just haven't gotten around to watching them.
 

axelfox

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
6,719
1
0
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
First one was. After that they were complete crap because of the ass photography they used. Unwatchable in the extreme. Complete waste of some of the best books I've read.

They're only loosely based on the books.

As for the movies themselves, I thought they were great, assuming you have an attention span greater than that of a 10 year old.

Not me. I tried to read the first one (after the movie), and all I kept saying to myself "Thats not in the movie!" :D :D
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
The quick shot fast camera switching fight scenes give me a fucking headache.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,697
6,257
126
Only have seen the first 2 and enjoyed them both very much. Will get #3 when out of DVD.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: NFS4
The quick shot fast camera switching fight scenes give me a fucking headache.

same.

i hated the camera work. whats annoying is after the Bourne movies a bunch of other copied the idea.