What if there is no modern liberalism?
Bill Clinton was a third-way/progressive populist. but unlike Jackson (or even LBJ), he did not think independently enough to minimize risk for actually different change. bush ran as a moderate in y2k and then he was scared for his security once he saw the damage he had overlooked (and to which his predecessor had willfully contributed) until the night of 9/11/01.
If you have noticed, the influence of central power moderates which means that self-described moderates simply advocate that order regardless of whether they can live happily free.
Conservatism is pro-order. moderation is a certain type of order pro tempore.
FDR was a conservative who sometimes liked to consider himself moderate or to call himself a liberal; he could never realize that he was like an inverted fascist like his buddy Thomas Wilson had been a proto-fascist and a nationalist on a global scale. Like Bush, FDR abused his power possibly even against what Hamilton envisioned.
One thing about the Constitution that never totally sucked is that it did protect private property rights. but then that traditionalism of private property rights was rooted in tyranny and elitism.
the smart power seekers and those who know how to use centralization to their advantage are never happy for long (too much power is never enough).
the security seekers are seldom happy.
some who wish to be free don't understand how free they could be without taxes.
then the very smartest and most creative minds like those from Jefferson and Rothbard are the truest libertarians both when dealing with others and in their philosophy; those minds try to educate but then they lose track of what is happening around them because the Statists/Authoritarians are always shutting their ideas down.
The Statists shut down new ideas, inductive reasoning, and basically the creator of the universe. Statists do that because authoritarians want easy money, to control others, and security for themselves.
centralization of power in one person or one person elected to let bureaucrats run wild forces compromise that few people are satisfied with, doesn't it?
can my soul not depart my body forever? why is no one allowed to help me permanently get out of suffering? will the State torture the individuals who free my soul from this universe forever and who free the world of my physical presence? are there plans for me to be enslaved to a private owner, for me to be altered, for my body parts to be reformed, or for me to be a dictator?
I am sorry if I sound so OCD. I wish I could help it.
Bill Clinton was a third-way/progressive populist. but unlike Jackson (or even LBJ), he did not think independently enough to minimize risk for actually different change. bush ran as a moderate in y2k and then he was scared for his security once he saw the damage he had overlooked (and to which his predecessor had willfully contributed) until the night of 9/11/01.
If you have noticed, the influence of central power moderates which means that self-described moderates simply advocate that order regardless of whether they can live happily free.
Conservatism is pro-order. moderation is a certain type of order pro tempore.
FDR was a conservative who sometimes liked to consider himself moderate or to call himself a liberal; he could never realize that he was like an inverted fascist like his buddy Thomas Wilson had been a proto-fascist and a nationalist on a global scale. Like Bush, FDR abused his power possibly even against what Hamilton envisioned.
One thing about the Constitution that never totally sucked is that it did protect private property rights. but then that traditionalism of private property rights was rooted in tyranny and elitism.
the smart power seekers and those who know how to use centralization to their advantage are never happy for long (too much power is never enough).
the security seekers are seldom happy.
some who wish to be free don't understand how free they could be without taxes.
then the very smartest and most creative minds like those from Jefferson and Rothbard are the truest libertarians both when dealing with others and in their philosophy; those minds try to educate but then they lose track of what is happening around them because the Statists/Authoritarians are always shutting their ideas down.
The Statists shut down new ideas, inductive reasoning, and basically the creator of the universe. Statists do that because authoritarians want easy money, to control others, and security for themselves.
centralization of power in one person or one person elected to let bureaucrats run wild forces compromise that few people are satisfied with, doesn't it?
can my soul not depart my body forever? why is no one allowed to help me permanently get out of suffering? will the State torture the individuals who free my soul from this universe forever and who free the world of my physical presence? are there plans for me to be enslaved to a private owner, for me to be altered, for my body parts to be reformed, or for me to be a dictator?
I am sorry if I sound so OCD. I wish I could help it.