Are you ready to get frisky with Trump?

[Vic]

Idiot liberals hated this, because it reduced crime in minority neighborhoods.

Yes, that was the reason, and not because it's a clear violation of the 4th amendment.

 

[agent00f]

And you can demonstrate this "fact" right here if you'd like -------->

This is his audience: https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...-roost-now-what.2486887/page-11#post-38481521

I guess it'll forever remain a mystery whether people like that prefer clinton or trump.

 

[theeedude]

Conservatives only know the second half of second amendment, because that's all AM radio talks about

 

[Roflmouth]

Yes, that was the reason, and not because it's a clear violation of the 4th amendment.

No such violation, but it made minority neighborhoods safer, so liberals despised it.

 

[Vic]

No such violation, but it made minority neighborhoods safer, so liberals despised it.

I'm not sure how to respond to this level of stupid.
If it's so effective in making neighborhoods safer, as you claim, then can I assume that you support the use of this practice in all neighborhoods?

 

[Roflmouth]

I'm not sure how to respond to this level of stupid.
If it's so effective in making neighborhoods safer, as you claim, then can I assume that you support the use of this practice in all neighborhoods?

The practice was city-wide, though I recognize facts are anathema to you.

 

[agent00f]

The practice was city-wide, though I recognize facts are anathema to you.

City-wide in neighborhoods with colors of people conservatives don't like.

 

[Vic]

The practice was city-wide, though I recognize facts are anathema to you.

You were the one who specified minority neighborhoods.
So if safety is your prime concern, why not just have police checkpoints everywhere? Using your logic, anyone who opposes that must be against safety and for crime. Let's have Trump's cowardly new world where we'll all safe at the point of government's gun. Sounds great! If you like the way of life in North Korea.