• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Are you 56k friendly?

D

DaWhim

Lifer
I was back to 56k for about 2.5 days. it was HELL! I didn't find any of you is 56k friendly with all the large pictures and video. 🙁
heck, I am not going back to 56k at all costs. 😀
 
no, im not monitor friendly either at 1600x1200 the jpegs i post are 2.5 megs

i posted a 35meg jpeg the other day 12600x6000
 
yeah, I hate it when people post pictures in their default digicam res which is usualy 2000x1500 or higher, not just that its lots and lots of kb's but also because its impossible to see the picture because you only see a part of it at a time.

Resize to 640x480 or something similar and ill be happy
 
Originally posted by: Czar
yeah, I hate it when people post pictures in their default digicam res which is usualy 2000x1500 or higher, not just that its lots and lots of kb's but also because its impossible to see the picture because you only see a part of it at a time.

Resize to 640x480 or something similar and ill be happy
Click to expand...

hehehe mine are 3008x2000

and i resize them to 1600x1200
 
Yep. With the exception of video and audio files, I figure a general rule of thumb is that, when you write a webpage, you should be able to hold your breath comfortably for the length of time it takes to load at 28.8kbps.
 
I always resize my pics to less then 1024x768 for net use. Normally 800x600 or 640x480. Saves time and I don't want to wait for load up!

Koing
 
Yes. Because I too am stuck in 56k hell 🙁

<rant>
I've never understood the people who can't resize pics, though. Look, even though you finally got a picture of your dog blowing the mailman I'm still not going to use it as my wallpaper so I don't need it at 2272x1704 or whatever other bullsh!t resolution you've uploaded at.
</rant>
 
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Yes. Because I too am stuck in 56k hell 🙁

<rant>
I've never understood the people who can't resize pics, though. Look, even though you finally got a picture of your dog blowing the mailman I'm still not going to use it as my wallpaper so I don't need it at 2272x1704 or whatever other bullsh!t resolution you've uploaded at.
</rant>
Click to expand...

when i resize pic to say 1024x768 its still about 600K
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top