When I see reasonable members take the time to make a lengthy post to expound on their points in a logical, orderly way, and then the fanboy reply to it is pretty much the equivalent of "durr, no, you are stupid and biased", it just breaks my heart, figuratively.
Anyway, this topic is straddling the fence between "valid tech thread" and "off-topic" (it is kind of a "meta" thread). I'm closing it now after giving it a fair shake (100 posts in).
If you need the conclusion spelled out to you: How can a subforum be biased if there is always discussion and dissent? There are very obvious fanboys on both sides, which evens out things, and I am very fine with it. It is a natural response to a close fight in the GPU front, unlike in the CPU section where no such flames happen due to the lopsided "fight" between Intel and AMD.
Moderator jvroig
Anyway, this topic is straddling the fence between "valid tech thread" and "off-topic" (it is kind of a "meta" thread). I'm closing it now after giving it a fair shake (100 posts in).
If you need the conclusion spelled out to you: How can a subforum be biased if there is always discussion and dissent? There are very obvious fanboys on both sides, which evens out things, and I am very fine with it. It is a natural response to a close fight in the GPU front, unlike in the CPU section where no such flames happen due to the lopsided "fight" between Intel and AMD.
Moderator jvroig
