Originally posted by: QED
I heard a lot of boos mixed with a lot of cheers, but that is no surprise. Lack of class seems to be quite contagious these days.
Originally posted by: A5
Originally posted by: QED
I heard a lot of boos mixed with a lot of cheers, but that is no surprise. Lack of class seems to be quite contagious these days.
What you call "lack of class", I call "free speech". Just because someone is rich enough to be elected president doesn't make anyone obligated to respect them.
Originally posted by: A5
Originally posted by: QED
I heard a lot of boos mixed with a lot of cheers, but that is no surprise. Lack of class seems to be quite contagious these days.
What you call "lack of class", I call "free speech". Just because someone is rich enough to be elected president doesn't make anyone obligated to respect them.
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: A5
Originally posted by: QED
I heard a lot of boos mixed with a lot of cheers, but that is no surprise. Lack of class seems to be quite contagious these days.
What you call "lack of class", I call "free speech". Just because someone is rich enough to be elected president doesn't make anyone obligated to respect them.
You respect the office, though... not the man.
I was no big fan of Clinton but I warmly applauded him when he was in Cleveland in the mid-90s to throw out the home opener at Jacobs Field.
You are correct-- it is your first amendment right to boo the President in that situation. It also demonstrates a lack of class-- just my opinion, though.
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: A5
Originally posted by: QED
I heard a lot of boos mixed with a lot of cheers, but that is no surprise. Lack of class seems to be quite contagious these days.
What you call "lack of class", I call "free speech". Just because someone is rich enough to be elected president doesn't make anyone obligated to respect them.
You respect the office, though... not the man.
I was no big fan of Clinton but I warmly applauded him when he was in Cleveland in the mid-90s to throw out the home opener at Jacobs Field.
You are correct-- it is your first amendment right to boo the President in that situation. It also demonstrates a lack of class-- just my opinion, though.
Originally posted by: QED
Originally posted by: A5
Originally posted by: QED
I heard a lot of boos mixed with a lot of cheers, but that is no surprise. Lack of class seems to be quite contagious these days.
What you call "lack of class", I call "free speech". Just because someone is rich enough to be elected president doesn't make anyone obligated to respect them.
You respect the office, though... not the man.
I was no big fan of Clinton but I warmly applauded him when he was in Cleveland in the mid-90s to throw out the home opener at Jacobs Field.
You are correct-- it is your first amendment right to boo the President in that situation. It also demonstrates a lack of class-- just my opinion, though.
Originally posted by: QED
I heard a lot of boos mixed with a lot of cheers, but that is no surprise. Lack of class seems to be quite contagious these days.
Originally posted by: TehMac
Originally posted by: QED
I heard a lot of boos mixed with a lot of cheers, but that is no surprise. Lack of class seems to be quite contagious these days.
It's Washington D.C. It's got a lot of politically correct, self righteous bigots who think they know better than everybody else. Is it any surprise they don't have class?