• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Are these Sandra Scores 'poor' for my new IC7 PC ??

thatsright

Diamond Member
Could Someone Offer any Suggestions Here?

I am running my IC7-non-g; Kingston HyperX PC3500 512MB X 2 in Dual Channel; manual settings in BIOS with timings of 2-3-2-5 & ULTRA Performance setting; a P4c 2.4Ghz at Stock Speed with N/B Strap option to PSB800. CPU is run with HT enabled. In XP Pro with SP1a, I run Sandra Memory Bandwidth Benchmark and the highest # I got was 4686MB?s. But now I consistently get around 4630. I have the 1.13 IC7 Bios.

I?m kind of surprised/disappointed with such memory scores. I was expecting higher, or is this the norm for this Memory and stock CPU speed? I do plan on O?Cing my system this weekend, but haven?t done so yet. I hear of some people getting up to or around 5900MB Sandra Scores with their rigs, but would I only get these numbers with a higher CPU speed? Or do I need Memory timings like 2-2-2-5 to get #?s like this?

And since I?m a bit new to O?Cing as well, if I?m only getting around 4630 average now, If I O?C will that # go down as when I change the FSB divider for O?Cing?

Thanks
 
I'm not sure of the Abit and performance acceleration, but that seems about right actually considering you're not o/c'ing. 2-3-2-5-4 are the magic numbers it seems for these chips (not o/c), but I find 2-3-3-6-4 works best when o/c'ing. I only get around 4900 @ 220MHz on a 1:1. You really don't get the really good bandwidth until you change to a 4:5 ratio and overclock. The best I've done is 5500 at 266MHz on a 5:4. I'd increase the VDIMM to 2.75 for a better optimization point.
 
Back
Top