- Mar 3, 2009
- 3,905
- 7
- 0
I have a threat going here asking about my BF2 crashes..someone suggested I find out what my temps are.. so I got HWinfo, and here's what it says, right after a reboot from crash:
GPU Thermal Diode: 66 C
GPU TS0: 65.5
GPU TS1: 76.5
GPU TS2: 71
Are those too hot?
Not even close. I have ran my card at 80*C 24/7 in Milkyway for months when I had it. Something else is causing your crashes.
It could be drivers/os issue, BF:BC2 issue (need a patch?), overclocked cpu, insufficient power supply.
If those are his temps after a reboot,something is wrong. It says after a crash and reboot, so they are idle temps.
no they're not hot... my 4890 is hottest when playing alien swarm at 75c tops, no aircon and i live in a tropical continent and my room is hot most of the time...I have a threat going here asking about my BF2 crashes..someone suggested I find out what my temps are.. so I got HWinfo, and here's what it says, right after a reboot from crash:
GPU Thermal Diode: 66 C
GPU TS0: 65.5
GPU TS1: 76.5
GPU TS2: 71
Are those too hot?
@riferut
how's the GTX 460 performing compared to your previous 4890? any tips?
Well i have not spent alot of time with it gaming yet and its hard to do a direct compare since i was using the 4890 on a AMD platform(PHII 940@3.6) and the 460 on a Intel platform(i7 930@4Ghz) but i will say this:
Anyone who said its a sidegrade is on crack. The 460 hands down beats the 4890 in every game i have tried so far. Overall gaming experience is smoother and minimum fraterate is higher. Games such as ME 2 and farcry 2 where the 4890 would bog down to 25-35fps at some really intense parts the 460 flies through and maintains 50-60fps. Im actually going to post a thread about it late in the week probably friday afer i get some more time into some games, ill make sure to shoot you a pm so you dont miss it.
In overall, the GTX 460 isn't much faster than the HD 4890, isn't twice faster, in many game scenarios, the HD 4890 is nipping the heels of the GTX 460 768 which isn't much slower than the GTX 460 1GB, but a platform change might had give you more performance. At what resolution were you playing Far Cry 2? I never got such slow downs when I had the single HD 4870 1GB.
Well i have not spent alot of time with it gaming yet and its hard to do a direct compare since i was using the 4890 on a AMD platform(PHII 940@3.6) and the 460 on a Intel platform(i7 930@4Ghz) but i will say this:
Anyone who said its a sidegrade is on crack. The 460 hands down beats the 4890 in every game i have tried so far. Overall gaming experience is smoother and minimum fraterate is higher. Games such as ME 2 and farcry 2 where the 4890 would bog down to 25-35fps at some really intense parts the 460 flies through and maintains 50-60fps. Im actually going to post a thread about it late in the week probably friday afer i get some more time into some games, ill make sure to shoot you a pm so you dont miss it.
That's a pretty big conclusion based on two games on two significantly different platform. Far Cry 2 isn't exactly the best game to compare performance since its heavily CPU dependent and favours Nvidia GPU's. A 768MB GTX 460 beats a 5850 card in that benchmark... but nobody in there right mind would say that overall the 5850 card is slower. Also a stock i920 (2.66 GHz) is a good 20-25% faster at FC2 then a PII 965 (3.6 GHz), with your 4Ghz OC on your i7 and the Nvidia card its understandable you are seeing a huge performance gain in FC2, but a bit pre-mature to expect the same huge gains in other games.
To OP. My 4890 temps use to be as high as yours so its pretty normal. It wasn't long after that I replaced the heatsink/fan with an Twin Turbo Pro and it made a huge difference in the load temp and more importantly noise department. Temps use to reach over 90C+ running Furbench now its around 75C.
Was playing 1920x1080 everything maxed highest settings 4xAA 16xAF, in direct x 10. I found that to be the problem, the 4890 did not do well in FC 2 with DX 10, it did alot better in DX 9. So far the 460(with its OC to 900/1000) is ripping through FC 2 alot better than the 4890 and can even do it with 8xAA, the 4890 was running at 1000/1150 so it was also OC'ed as far as it would go with the stock heatsink/fan.
EDITED TO ADD: I agree the platform swap is also the reason im noticing such a difference in some situations, there is no denying that AMD is behind in clock for clock single threaded performace, and even though games are "multi core capable" or whatever it doesnt mean they are well threaded.
And to the OP i am truly sorry to de-rail your thread.