Well Samsung still seems to be doing it. But apparently almost everyone else has stopped. And it doesn't seem like there is any signs that Samsung will stop anytime soon. Why should they, it's the advantage they have over everyone else.
i will only buy phones with expandable memory and removable battery.
it's just so stupid to have to go to a store and pay them some fees to swap a battery if its dead. but i understand this isnt a problem for most people since they update phones every 2 years.
Why have so many companies stopped doing it?
the whole focus on thinness - typically requires non-removable components to make things thinner, and maybe no space for microSD?
anyways, companies want consumers to treat phones as disposable devices... after 2 years, battery isn't that good, can't replace, easier to just (give samsung money) and upgrade the phone
Regarding mSD, during the previous generation the S4 had it, the HTC One (M7) did not, and neither did the LG G2. The next year, the S5 had, the M8 had it, and the G3 had it. So if anything the popular flagships increased in mSD support.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the issue is not whether or not you can replace the battery or upgrade storage. It's whether the built-in battery and storage are enough to meet your needs.
If every smartphone could last a full day of heavy use and could fit everything you realistically needed, you wouldn't need removables. We're getting there -- the HTC One M8 is one of the few mid-sized phones that doesn't seem to run out of juice right at the end of the day, and there are (wildly expensive) 128GB iPhones. The tech just needs to be both cheaper and more commonplace.
Feel like I hear the M8 doesn't have great battery life.
It is a HUGE jump from my S4. Like 50%+. Anandtech' testing bears that out:
![]()