• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Are newer 45nm LGA775 CPUs more Overclockable?

What should I do to improve performance?

  • Buy a newer 2011 Wolfdale 2mb CPU, they overclock better then the old ones.

  • Burn your current 2008 E5200 with 1.4+ volts.

  • Be happy with 2.5 Ghz, and save your $100.

Results are only viewable after voting.
Doltmoopsie

Doltmoopsie

Junior Member
Are newer 2011, 45nm LGA775 CPUs more Overclock-able then the 2008 parts?

I have a Pentium E5200 from 2008, it does not overclock well (can't hit 3.33Ghz at safe voltages). I have been considering buying another LGA775 CPU while I wait for Ivy Bridge to come out. The Pentium Dual-Core E5400, E5700, E5800, etc. are all under $100.

Should I expect that I can hit 4Ghz+ with normal voltages and a new (2011) E5400+ ?

Should I just "burn" the current E5200 (2008) with 1.4+ volts?
 
LOL. It's probably your motherboard. Everyone I know and all of the reviews were able to get 3.8-4GHz out of the Pentium E5200.

Also, there's no guarantee you'll get a new chip when you buy an E5400. It could've easily been stored for a year, as the member above me said.

You want something decent that'll hold you out until next year for $100, try to get a cheap used Q8000 series CPU, preferably a Q8300 or Q8400. Don't get the Q8200; it's a bad OCer. If you get a dual-core, clock-for-clock you're only looking at 10% improvements for E8000. In multi-threaded apps a Q8300 at the same clocks you are now should be 40-50% faster.
 
I vote none of those options. If you really need an upgrade, then get a 2500k and be done with it. Ivy isn't out until late March of 2012. That's a long time to wait. Also, going from E5200 to 2500k is going to be a massive difference. I doubt Ivy is going to be that much better than a 2500k @ 4.5ghz. Also, with that logic when Ivy ships, we'll probably be 12-15 months away from Haswell, which will spank it. In other words, there is little point in waiting.
 
Doltmoopsie said:
What can you do with a Mazda RX-8 that you can't do with a Toyota Yaris?
Click to expand...

Take turns at much harder angles, accelerate faster, autocross, etc. etc. A shit load of fun too.

But you have to be into doing that. If you will drive the RX-8 exactly like you will drive a Yaris, and maintain the car within the limits of what the Yaris can handle, then, at most, you'll just be graced with a nicer looking car (and potentially a manual transmission if you made the right decision...)

If everything you do right now is handled perfectly fine, what is the incentive to upgrade? To put it a better way: if the games that you play all give you 100+ fps, why upgrade?

Is there a game you tried that you WANT to play that is giving you <30/60 FPS and you know the bottleneck is the cpu? Do you encode all day long and could benefit from a faster cpu? Are you dealing with crazy simulation programs that each up all the cpu cycles they can get? Do you partake in distributed computing? Is there any application you use enough that a speed boost from the CPU will make a more pleasurable experience?

It is questions like this that truly help to decide whether or not you should spend more money now to upgrade a CPU.
 
bunnyfubbles said:
burn more gas while getting from point A to point B no faster if obeying the law and being less comfortable while carrying more than 2 persons and/or luggage?
Click to expand...


Some people buy cars for more than just getting from one point to the other, you know. Some people actually care about having something that's fun to drive.


Anyway, we should stop derailing this thread further. This thread is about CPUs, not cars.
 
LOL_Wut_Axel said:
LOL. It's probably your motherboard. Everyone I know and all of the reviews were able to get 3.8-4GHz out of the Pentium E5200.
Click to expand...
This.

I upgraded a friend's rig with an E5200, when they first came out, and he was able to hit 3.75Ghz, on 1.42v (1.4v CPU-Z under load). IP35-E mobo.

Unfortunately, he stopped doing SoB for me, so his computer wasn't loaded anymore, so the vcore bumped up to 1.42 at idle, and the CPU degraded over a few years. It's currently clocked at 3.5, after lowering to 3.65 first. CPU degraded that much. So don't burn your E5200 with 1.4v+, it won't last.
 
LOL_Wut_Axel said:
Some people buy cars for more than just getting from one point to the other, you know. Some people actually care about having something that's fun to drive.


Anyway, we should stop derailing this thread further. This thread is about CPUs, not cars.
Click to expand...
which is exactly what I was doing...illustrating the fallacy of car analogies, even when done correctly (of which this one was waaayyy off) they're still foolish
 
If a 3.3GHz E5200 isnt fast enough, then you're probably sensing a need for more cores rather than a need for more speed. Any quad will produce very noticable improvments. A faster dual core wont get you anything you can feel, unless it has 6MB of cache. (And thats hella expensive.)

lol @ the "buy a 2500k" crap.
 
My e5200 couldn't get near 3.8-4ghz. Thats definitely not even close to a common oc. I was able to get it stable @ 3.3ghz with a couple bumps in voltage. Just run it at 3.3ghz if you can do it at a safe voltage.
 
Would help if we knew what OP has for a motherboard. As previous posters have pointed out, this could limit a lot of CPUs' potential.
 
betasub said:
Would help if we knew what OP has for a motherboard. As previous posters have pointed out, this could limit a lot of CPUs' potential.
Click to expand...

1099.jpg


vx450-angled.png


I have a Gigabyte EP45-UD3P (rev. 1.1) and my memory is 4GB DDR2-800 by Crucial. Power supply is the fan-tasticly quiet Corsair vx450w, that produces only 21 decibels.

All voltages but VCore have been Stock (not BIOS default of Auto). I have not been using any overclock on the memory.
 
That P45 should give you FSB options up around 500 - much better than my P35 board that got flakey at anything above FSB400. But check your memory divider/multiplier options: that DDR2-800 may limit you unless the BIOS has a ratio to underclock it.
 
Doltmoopsie said:
What can you do with a Mazda RX-8 that you can't do with a Toyota Yaris?
Click to expand...

I see what you did there ...

But I was wondering exactly about that... Considering that speed limit is around 100km/h here on highways, both cars get to 100km/h easy. I guess RX-8 is probably more of a chick magnet compared to the Yaris so that's pretty much the only difference, and the price.
 
betasub said:
That P45 should give you FSB options up around 500 - much better than my P35 board that got flakey at anything above FSB400. But check your memory divider/multiplier options: that DDR2-800 may limit you unless the BIOS has a ratio to underclock it.
Click to expand...

I had some P31 boards that had trouble with FSB400 too. Then I got a P41, and it has trouble with FSB350! :\ I thought the P4x series used roughly the same chips. So it might be your board at that. Or maybe I'm confused.

sm625 said:
lol @ the "buy a 2500k" crap.
Click to expand...

Actually, he has a point. Not a 2500K, of course; but remember that the OP is looking for Ivy Bridge, which can plug in to the same board as SB chips. So if you're willing to buy the motherboard and RAM now instead of later, you could go with an i3 2100 or the like now, for a little over $100, and trade straight up to Ivy Bridge later.
 
To get any speed you need large cache and fast fsb and memory.
A 2 meg cache might be cool for the web but not much else

the below gets replaced with a cheap asrock z68 this week
Codename Wolfdale
Specs Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
Package (platform ID) Socket 775 LGA (0x0)
CPUID 6.7.A
Extended CPUID 6.17
Core Stepping E0
Technology 45 nm
TDP Limit 65 Watts
Core Speed 4079.9 MHz
Multiplier x FSB 8.0 x 510.0 MHz
Rated Bus speed 2040.0 MHz
voltage 0 1.36 Volts [0xAA] (CPU VCORE)

Mainboard Model Rampage Formula
Northbridge Intel X48 rev. 01
Southbridge Intel 82801IR (ICH9R) rev. 02
Graphic Interface PCI-Express
PCI-E Link Width x16
PCI-E Max Link Width x16
Memory Type DDR2
Memory Size 6144 MBytes
Channels Dual, (Symmetric)
Memory Frequency 510.0 MHz (1:1
 
Doltmoopsie said:
What can you do with a Mazda RX-8 that you can't do with a Toyota Yaris?
Click to expand...

Rev to 9000?

On to the thread - Quad core or save the money for a small upgrade. As others have said, it's likely the motherboard holding you back.

But isn't 1.4V safe enough for 45nm chips?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top