PlasmaBomb
Lifer
- Nov 19, 2004
- 11,636
- 2
- 81
This space for rent
+1000 internets if you change it to No.
Since they died out 65 million years ago.
No comment on Young Earth.
This space for rent
it isn't possible for life to come from nonlife.
Dinosaur bones are fake. They're here to test our faith.
An argument is that life was created. That doesn't rule out evolution of course because once you add the yeast so to speak, it grows and changes independently. Of course I have no clue why things started, but Jesus didn't ride no tyrannosaurosesses.
BTW I don't know what he'll do if he ever realizes what a bryophyte is and how old they are. That will freak him out.![]()
Yeah, one of my university biology profs used the argument that a god *could* use evolution as a tool, in order to shut up a highly vocal, ignorant bible thumper in class. That people can nit-pick that for which we have abundant evidence, yet have no problem with swallowing the whole hocus-pocus god did it act without any evidence is really hilarious.
Why do people assume that the commonly given age of 65m for dinosaurs is accurate? I don't. The bible makes a whole lot more sense than evolution to me now that I've read up on evolution and how it isn't possible for life to come from nonlife.
Aren't evolutionists unable to explain how life came from non life?
Troll
TrollTroll
TrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTrollTroll
TrollTrollTroll
TrollTroll
<snip>
Why? how old does the Bible say dinosaurs are?
The Bible is bafflingly silent on this issue.
Why do people assume that the commonly given age of 65m for dinosaurs is accurate? I don't. The bible makes a whole lot more sense than evolution to me now that I've read up on evolution and how it isn't possible for life to come from nonlife.
Aren't evolutionists unable to explain how life came from non life?
Scientists do attempt to explain how life came from non-life with abiogenesis.
The problem with that is all the experiments either:
1) Involve an intelligent scientist
2) Require millions of years and/or a time machine
So you have to pretty much take it on faith that life arose spontaneously from the chemicals and energy present on early earth. There's no way to conduct sound science that proves the timeline. Evolution that requires millions of years is not a testable scientific theory, it is proposed history.
Someone will post the font color-change paragraph as a visual analogy, but it's not comparable, since there is no way to directly observe or test past events. You have to make assumptions about (i.e. put faith in) past events regardless of whether you accept the current scientific chronology or biblical chronology.
Why do people assume that the commonly given age of 65m for dinosaurs is accurate? I don't. The bible makes a whole lot more sense than evolution to me now that I've read up on evolution and how it isn't possible for life to come from nonlife.
Aren't evolutionists unable to explain how life came from non life?
An argument is that life was created. That doesn't rule out evolution of course because once you add the yeast so to speak, it grows and changes independently. Of course I have no clue why things started, but Jesus didn't ride no tyrannosaurosesses.
How much fucking acid did you smoke for that to happen?
Oh crap, this retard has been let out of P&N. If anyone wants to know how much of a nut the OP is, just look at his threads in P&N.
