Just because you own a game it doesn't make it all right to bypass anti-piracy measures in order to make your life more convenient.
Originally posted by: jumpr
If you already have a bottle of juice and you go into a gas station and steal another bottle of juice, it's still illegal. Just because you own a game it doesn't make it all right to bypass anti-piracy measures in order to make your life more convenient.
Originally posted by: jumpr
If you already have a bottle of juice and you go into a gas station and steal another bottle of juice, it's still illegal. Just because you own a game it doesn't make it all right to bypass anti-piracy measures in order to make your life more convenient.
Originally posted by: jumpr
If you already have a bottle of juice and you go into a gas station and steal another bottle of juice, it's still illegal. Just because you own a game it doesn't make it all right to bypass anti-piracy measures in order to make your life more convenient.
You definatly thought long and hard about this one.If you already have a bottle of juice and you go into a gas station and steal another bottle of juice, it's still illegal. Just because you own a game it doesn't make it all right to bypass anti-piracy measures in order to make your life more convenient.
Originally posted by: jumpr
If you already have a bottle of juice and you go into a gas station and steal another bottle of juice, it's still illegal. Just because you own a game it doesn't make it all right to bypass anti-piracy measures in order to make your life more convenient.
? The SOFTWARE PRODUCT may require the original media for use of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT on the COMPUTER and/or employ copy protection technology to prevent the unauthorized copying of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT. It is illegal to make unauthorized copies of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT or circumvent any copy protection technology employed in the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.
Originally posted by: AndyHui
Isn't it bypassing copy protection technology?
Originally posted by: Brutuskend
But would a NO CD crack fall under that rule?
It's not copying, or by passing a copy protecting technology.
Originally posted by: Brutuskend
But would a NO CD crack fall under that rule?
It's not copying, or by passing a copy protecting technology.
Technically it's not copy protection technology, since you're not doing anything that will allow you to make a copy of the game itself(bypassing say, Safedisc with Alcohol would, however), but it's close enough that it probably counts. And I can already get where you're going with this: it's probably in violation of that wonderful DMCA.:|Originally posted by: AndyHui
Isn't it bypassing copy protection technology?
The DMCA specifically outlaws ANY circumventing of anti-piracy features. For ANY reason
The DMCA is illegal.Originally posted by: BlipBlop
The DMCA specifically outlaws ANY circumventing of anti-piracy features. For ANY reason
..and makes illegal any devices or software used in such circumvention. The law is so draconian and broad that its apparent to a twelve-year old that record companies and not constitutional scholars were at work here. The irony is that running software necessarily requires one to "bypass" the protection since it is often in the EXE file as someone posted. Therefore, taking the DMCA to its logical conclusion, the computer, program,and CD itself are all illegal.