I thought we got past the entire cliche backlash thing when they won the grammy 6-7 mos ago?
Obligatory - been a fan since XXXXX. First time I heard them, I didn't like Win's voice. But one of my best friends, whose opinion I usually trust, kept hounding me. So, just after Funeral came out, I found myself at a Borders listening station, when Neighborhood #1 (Tunnels) started trickling out of the headphones. About 5 minutes later I was hooked.
Like any band to rise to as much citical, and now, commercial/public prominence, there's going to be the inevitable backlash, and when you're under that much of a microscope, all of your warts are on display. Still, I have never seen them live and not come away with an enormous smile on my face and a feeling that I, and the people I went to the show with, were part of something, however small, brief, or relatively insignficant. And here's the telling part - I listen to too many bands to have any kind of accurate count of. I am obsessed with music, from multiple genres and decades/periods, to the point where I keep about 96GB of songs in my car alone (multiple USB drives), and the folder that I consistently pull up month after month, for the last several years, is Arcade Fire. They're just... good.
And there's no use arguing particular musical preferences. darkswordsman17 it seems, prefers a little more hotdog virtuosity. Good thing, I say, because folks like you keep a lot of musicians in business. I've never believed in that at all. Most of my musical heroes, from blues guys like BB King, to british rockers like the Kinks, on to more modern bands, have consistently held to the idea that you do not overplay. Play what the song needs and nothing more - that is the true art to playing music. Overplaying is the science of technical wizardry, but I personally don't consider it art. As for Arcade Fire's musicianship - you only have to see them jumping from instrument to instrument, incorporating a lot of sounds that were certainly not in vogue several years ago (yes, the hurdy-gurdy), and watch them NOT overplay them, to appreciate that they are searching for a very particular sound, and so they will not overdo it. Melody is a delicate thing and they are going to achieve it with just enough effort. Also, they are paced by one of the better bass and drum combos in pop music. Those guys could play anything, but choose not to.
Also - as for their lyrics and the defining lyrical "importance" or weight - they do tend to retain a perspective of someone much younger than any of them currently are - that almost childlike wonderment that some people still retain into their twenties (or longer). I don't fault them for that - that's kind of the point of a lot of their early music - how we too easily give up on those ideals. They're not focusing as much on the specific, except as it relates to the bigger idea. A lot of other bands can hit you over the head with grizzly, depressing details about abuse, emotional degradation, and descent into the abyss. That's not to say there is no weight. Neon Bible is so loaded down with it that it's almost too preachy - something I think Win and Regine were trying to overcome on The Suburbs.
In any case, AF are pretty much cementing themselves as one of the most prominent pop/rock bands of the last 20 years. They already made the best (by consensus critical opinion) pop album of the last decade (Funeral). A couple more solid albums, and it'll be hard to not call them legends.
But don't just listen to them. There is so much good music out there. I do dislike hearing someone discover them or another band and go into crush mode and not listen to anything else (or give any other bands credit) for months or years on end. That's too narrow of a viewpoint. If anything, listening to other music will help put them in perspective, in a healthy way. As much as it seems I like them, I listen to hundreds of other bands every week.
PS - thanks to anyone who doesnt reply tl;dr