- Aug 22, 2001
- 31,197
- 29,735
- 146
Might be a little while and probably 6gb model like the a380. The B570/80 both need at least 1 power cable.LP slot powered model
B380 and B310 is exactly what I am hoping they do. If the B380 games like the A580 for $120 and is slot powered that'd be a great ultra budget card.Might be a little while and probably 6gb model like the a380. The B570/80 both need at least 1 power cable.
Sorry to disappoint, but it's not possible. A card at this cost level has much more attributed to fixed costs, so they need to cut the die disproportionately.If the B380 games like the A580 for $120 and is slot powered that'd be a great ultra budget card.
The difference in performance may be quite minor. I'm thinking 6-7% in average and maybe it can do 10%, but at 4K. Also it's not 8GB RAM, but 10GB which means not so terrible.I think the B570 needs to be $199.99. Without a $50 price difference there is no reason to give up the extra vram or better performance.
You think so? Even if it's just 20% more VRAM?If the B570 is that close in performance to the B580 with less ram, most people will pay the $25-$30 for the extra ram. $50 is a different price tier and will result in more positive reviews and better sales.
12GB is meme status as the new minimum on PCMR with over 14 million members. The 3060 12GB is currently in the number 1 and 3 spots on Amazon U.S. at the moment, and there are 3 models in the top ten. The prices are $280-$300 for a soon to be 2 gen old card. That speaks to the impact vram has on influencing sales. I think that 20% less vram needs a 20% discount.You think so? Even if it's just 20% more VRAM?
Yep, I use Slickdeals comments as my barometer for "non PCMR/non anandtech but more regular Joe shoppers" and the push back on 8GB and the recommendation for higher memory cards is prevalent when people ask if deals are "good or not". I think 8GB cards are the cusp of a pretty chilly reception.12GB is meme status as the new minimum on PCMR with over 14 million members. The 3060 12GB is currently in the number 1 and 3 spots on Amazon U.S. at the moment, and there are 3 models in the top ten. The prices are $280-$300 for a soon to be 2 gen old card. That speaks to the impact vram has on influencing sales. I think that 20% less vram needs a 20% discount.
What do you mean by needs REBAR support? Like these cards won't even post if in a motherboard that doesn't have it on? If so that is a huge problem IMO.B3xx is a problem because it still needs ReBar support, and lower the card is, the more it'll be used in older systems. I expected that and power management in idle to be fixed, but unfortunately it did not. Based on rumored amount of Battlemage dies out there, they definitely struggled and probably missed some project goals.
Sorry to disappoint, but it's not possible. A card at this cost level has much more attributed to fixed costs, so they need to cut the die disproportionately.
I'm thinking 64-bit bus and maybe 6 Xe2 cores. Based on how B580 performs, that'll probably be GTX 1650 Super level in 1080p. 30-50% over A380.
Another evidence that it cannot reach anywhere near A580 is power consumption. 50% improvement in perf/W means 2.5-2.7x performance required would get it over the slot power limit. Fixed power use also increases for lower power cards, meaning it'll do worse relative to higher end cards.
The difference in performance may be quite minor. I'm thinking 6-7% in average and maybe it can do 10%, but at 4K. Also it's not 8GB RAM, but 10GB which means not so terrible.
What do you mean by needs REBAR support? Like these cards won't even post if in a motherboard that doesn't have it on? If so that is a huge problem IMO.
Iss there an issue with enabling rebar support? It's one click in the BIOS.
I don't know how Battlemage is, but ReBar issues were more serious than just performance, which would drop significantly. It affected compatibility and created glitches in some games too.What do you mean by needs REBAR support? Like these cards won't even post if in a motherboard that doesn't have it on? If so that is a huge problem IMO.
I enabled it as soon as I noticed it, not had any problems with it but I'm not entirely sure that it does a great deal! (5800X3D, RX6950XT and a x470 MB)Support. You need a new enough chipset and I believe CPU. AMD says a 500 series chipset but it's an option on my B450. I tried it once but it didn't seem stable so I turned it off. I would've looked into it more but it really isn't necessary since I'm not using an Arc.
You've piqued my interest though. I'm going to try it out again this weekend when I get some game time in and try it again.
I enabled it as soon as I noticed it, not had any problems with it but I'm not entirely sure that it does a great deal! (5800X3D, RX6950XT and a x470 MB)
The problems are bigger than that, at least for Alchemist. People reported compatibility issues(although fairly rare), and report system for ARC said systems without Intel iGPU has partial ReBar support, meaning 8GB is Rebar but other 8GB is no ReBar in Vulkan, which means it would potentially lose performance even in newer systems.They'll POST and be usable. Their performance drops off a cliff though. Especially things like 1% lows if I remember right.