Apple to ditch IBM, switch to Intel chips **Updated 6/7** x86 Mac systems *should* run Windows

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jhu

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,918
9
81
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
There is no way that Mac systems 'should' run windows. Windows uses a BIOS to load while macs use Open Firmware (i might be wrong)

that is rather interesting that windows will run on the mac but mac os won't run on a pc. this suggests that either the intel macs will be using bios or they'll be using some other firmware that can load other operating systems but has does something special for mac os. i don't think openfirmware will be in the intel macs, but more likely efi.
 

JASANITY

Senior member
Dec 10, 2000
504
0
0
who cares. the real news is apple OS will be available to install on all amd and intel chips!
 

chcarnage

Golden Member
May 11, 2005
1,751
0
0
Originally posted by: clarkey01
Originally posted by: JoeKing
Doesn't Microsoft have some money invested in Apple? Or has Apple already bought that interest back?

Yeah Im not sure either, I think I heard something about it a while back

Microsoft bought $150 Millions of Apple shares without voting rights back in 1997, but they selled them in the meantime.
 

ironcrotch

Diamond Member
May 11, 2004
7,749
0
0
Originally posted by: JASANITY
who cares. the real news is apple OS will be available to install on all amd and intel chips!

you really don't know much do you. ;) Apple will be able to run OSX and apple won't stop mac users from installing Windows, but Macs will be the only systems to run OSX, I'm pretty sure SJ will make sure of it.
 

Ciber

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2000
2,531
30
91
Originally posted by: Falloutboy
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
Originally posted by: Falloutboy
hehe i give is a few weeks before were seing versions of OS x 10.4 for x86 floating around on the newsgroups

GL with that one :p:D

I don't see why not the dev boxes they are shipping seem to be nothing more than an intel OEM motherboard with standard off the shelf components put into a g5 case

Not to mention that ANYONE willing to pay $1,500(1k for box and $500 for adc select membership) can get a dev box.

My friend's company has a Premier membership and he said he might buy one. :)
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
Originally posted by: JASANITY
who cares. the real news is apple OS will be available to install on all amd and intel chips!

you really don't know much do you. ;) Apple will be able to run OSX and apple won't stop mac users from installing Windows, but Macs will be the only systems to run OSX, I'm pretty sure SJ will make sure of it.

He's actually pretty close.

Now that the MacOS will run an x86 binary, it's only a small hack-job away from running on a normal PC.

I'm sure Apple will take measures to prevent it, but that's only a minor hurdle. Look how hackproof all the copy protection and encryption is. It will be hacked in the first couple of weeks I bet.
 

crabbyman

Senior member
Jul 24, 2002
529
1
76
Xlr8yourmac.com provides some detailed comments from one of the developers at WWDC describing the current development Intel-Mac which currently features a 3.6GHz Pentium 4.

Minor highlights:

- "the thing is fast". All iLife apps are already universal binaries
- Pentium 4 660 at 3.6GHz, but will not be used in the shipping product (of course, since the high end Intel-Mac is 2 years away)
- DDR-2 RAM at 533. SATA-2.
- Presently uses the Intel GMA 900 integrated graphics chip set which supports Quartz Extreme.
- Regular video cards will be supported, but need drivers
- No Open Firmware. Uses Phoenix BIOS.

Major highlights:

- "They run Windows fine. All the chipset is standard Intel stuff, so you can download drivers and run XP - on the box."
- Game devs optimistic. "They look forward to the day they don't have to support PPC."
- Cell and AMD were evaluated. Cell not intended for PCs; AMD with supply constraints.

Photos of the Intel PowerMac at WWDC.

Note: It is impossible to tell if final shipping Intel Macs will share features common with this development Mac.... there has been suggestions that the final Intel-Macs will not simply be PC Bios/Motherboards. We'll have to wait and see...


Mac News
News.com confirms that Transitive Technologies is, in fact, the technology behind Apple's Rosetta PowerPC Emulator for their upcoming Intel-based Macintoshes.

Jobs reportedly confirmed Transitive's role in a New York Times interview, but in general, Apple has been very quiet about their Transitive's role in Rosetta. Of note, Jobs' keynote speech on Monday gave no mention to the startup.

It appears Transitive's technology can provide 60-80 percent performance of native software based on real world experience with SGI. Some analysts, however, have doubts about the performance promises.

First mention of Transitive came in July 2003. The most accurate and earliest rumor about Transitive's use by Apple came as a Page 2 news item in February 2005:

...there is evidence that Apple has had special internal seeds of Tiger which support [Transitive's technology] for the x86 platform. Beyond allowing Tiger to run on x86, perhaps more significantly is the potential to also allow existing Mac OS X applications to be run on the x86 (PC) platform without recompilation.
Apple, of course, is not offering Mac OS X for the PC, but instead offering Intel-based Macs.


Ripped from Macrumors.com