Apple sues Samsung over Galaxy S' "similarities" to iPhone

Kabob

Lifer
Sep 5, 2004
15,248
0
76
Taken from Phandroid
When I first compiled my review of the Samsung Galaxy S last summer, one of my minor gripes with the device was it’s overwhelming resemblance to the iPhone. The silhouette of the device, it’s singular “home” button foregoing Android’s typical four, and a user interface looking a bit too Apple-inspired made the device feel like a knockoff in some ways. Don’t think Apple didn’t take notice. In a lawsuit filed April 15th, Apple is suing Samsung over “slavishly” copying the look and feel of the iPhone and iPad in their Galaxy lineup of Android devices.

Apple representative Kristing Huguet called the similarities between Galaxy devices and those using iOS “blatant,” while Samsung has yet to comment. This is not your typical patent lawsuit hinging on a small aspect or feature a phone offers. The Galaxy S 4G, Epic 4G, Galaxy Tab, and even the Nexus S are named. If Apple comes out on top, the implications could be big for Samsung, not to mention the payout Steve Jobs and company will surely demand.

I find this particularly hilarious considering how many components Apple buys from them. Can you say $5.7 Billion last year?
Aside from Apple’s “intellectual property,” what else is at stake in the infringement suit recently filed by the Cupertino company against Samsung? $5.7 billion worth of business between the companies, the reported amount Apple spent on buying components from the Korean manufacturer for use in their various products. We’re talking everything from processors and RAM to flash storage and displays. In fact, Apple is said to be Sammy’s second largest client, following behind Sony. It would seem apparent that the two companies depend greatly on each other’s business.

Samsung has come out saying the company has “no choice but [to] respond strongly.” Word is the makers of the Galaxy line of Android products, the very lineup of phones and tablets at the center of the lawsuit, is gearing up to file a countersuit alleging that Apple is infringing on several of Samsung’s patents. If you didn’t think this one would get messy, you better think again.

Heck, didn't Samsung help design the original iPhone?
 

Fire&Blood

Platinum Member
Jan 13, 2009
2,333
18
81
Too funny. A while ago a friend of mine bought the Samsung F700. I didn't like the phone's keyboard and look. Eventually he returned it because of buggy software. However, few months later the iphone was launched and the first image of the iphone reminded me of the F700. Go figure.

I'm not allowed to post attachments but google the image and you'll see the resemblance.

I think the lawsuit will be dismissed but I am intrigued by it's timing.
 

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
I remember noticing the resemblance in the original Galaxy S i9000 promotional images. Doesn't help that Samsung had an image of the iOS-like app list instead of the typical Android home screen in all of their images. TouchWiz's app list is very similar to iOS, with horizontally oriented pages and a dot indicator along the top.

My Epic doesn't look anything like an iPhone though.
 

Cuda1447

Lifer
Jul 26, 2002
11,757
0
71
So iphone has the rights to... square phones, horizontal app drawers, dots representing screens, what else? Silver bezels? I mean, seriously? Yea, the phones look similar. But honestly, most smart phones all look pretty similar. There is only so much you can do to a phone to make it different. WTF do you want, triangle shaped rainbow colored phones with hieroglyphics representing screen #'s?
 

Glitchny

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2002
5,679
1
0
That was probably contracted out. What they're saying is that Samsung (the Mobile division) copied the "look and feel" of iOS.

Oh I know why they are suing, I was just stating that Samsung has been pretty involved in Apple's production.
 

sciwizam

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,953
0
0
Too funny. A while ago a friend of mine bought the Samsung F700. I didn't like the phone's keyboard and look. Eventually he returned it because of buggy software. However, few months later the iphone was launched and the first image of the iphone reminded me of the F700. Go figure.

I'm not allowed to post attachments but google the image and you'll see the resemblance.

I think the lawsuit will be dismissed but I am intrigued by it's timing.

Here you go...

aLGOQ.jpg
 

Kabob

Lifer
Sep 5, 2004
15,248
0
76

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
I wouldn't be too sure about the lawsuit being dismissed.

Apple likely doesn't want money, they want production to stop, and they want to send a message to the other manufacturers.
 

Fire&Blood

Platinum Member
Jan 13, 2009
2,333
18
81
Thanks for posting the image. The F700 is actually older than the iphone, Samsung would stand a better chance of winning if they sued Apple for copying the F700 if they had patented it.

I was actually surprised that the use of accelerometer to switch landscape/portrait mode hasn't been patented back in 2005, would have have made a great leverage in patent lawsuit as it's substantial, most of these patents thrown around are quite vague compared to it.
 

zoiks

Lifer
Jan 13, 2000
11,787
3
81
Thanks for posting the image. The F700 is actually older than the iphone, Samsung would stand a better chance of winning if they sued Apple for copying the F700 if they had patented it.

I was actually surprised that the use of accelerometer to switch landscape/portrait mode hasn't been patented back in 2005, would have have made a great leverage in patent lawsuit as it's substantial, most of these patents thrown around are quite vague compared to it.

I didn't know that styles could be patented.
 

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0
wow... that's halarious. The F700 looks so similar to the iphone.

The iphone simply became the most popular smart phone out there. without digging, you'd probably assume others took inspiration from the iphone.

When I first saw the Galaxy I actually wondered if Apple would sue them because of the similarities. Apple even sues for stuff other people already own though... iphone name rights belonged to Cisco, same w\ ios... They don't seem to mind doing that, why try to attack their competition?
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
Apple likely has contingency plans ready or they woudn't have done this.

And you don't think likewise for Samsung? Samsung had to know Apple would likely come after them. Only the blind wouldn't have noticed the similarities between the iPhone and the Galaxy S. Judging by that F700 picture, Samsung might have some other dirt they can dig up.
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
I think Samsung has the most to gain from this suit. First, Samsung gets free publicity for their Galaxy S. Samsung branding seems to be paying off for Galaxy S as some of my less tech friends have mentioned the name. Second, Apple needs Samsung more than Samsung needs Apple. Samsung can easily make up 5-6% lost Apple revenue with increased Galaxy S sales if it comes to Apple pulling out. Samsung is now Apple's biggest competitor and Apple knows it. That's why Apple has recently tried to foster the growth of some of the smaller suppliers by helping them grow.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
I think Samsung has the most to gain from this suit. First, Samsung gets free publicity for their Galaxy S. Samsung branding seems to be paying off for Galaxy S as some of my less tech friends have mentioned the name. Second, Apple needs Samsung more than Samsung needs Apple. Samsung can easily make up 5-6% lost Apple revenue with increased Galaxy S sales if it comes to Apple pulling out. Samsung is now Apple's biggest competitor and Apple knows it. That's why Apple has recently tried to foster the growth of some of the smaller suppliers by helping them grow.

I dunno, I guess I'm just a spectator, both corporations are doing very well, I can see both points of view.