Discussion Apple Silicon SoC thread

Page 228 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
23,825
1,396
126
M1
5 nm
Unified memory architecture - LP-DDR4
16 billion transistors

8-core CPU

4 high-performance cores
192 KB instruction cache
128 KB data cache
Shared 12 MB L2 cache

4 high-efficiency cores
128 KB instruction cache
64 KB data cache
Shared 4 MB L2 cache
(Apple claims the 4 high-effiency cores alone perform like a dual-core Intel MacBook Air)

8-core iGPU (but there is a 7-core variant, likely with one inactive core)
128 execution units
Up to 24576 concurrent threads
2.6 Teraflops
82 Gigatexels/s
41 gigapixels/s

16-core neural engine
Secure Enclave
USB 4

Products:
$999 ($899 edu) 13" MacBook Air (fanless) - 18 hour video playback battery life
$699 Mac mini (with fan)
$1299 ($1199 edu) 13" MacBook Pro (with fan) - 20 hour video playback battery life

Memory options 8 GB and 16 GB. No 32 GB option (unless you go Intel).

It should be noted that the M1 chip in these three Macs is the same (aside from GPU core number). Basically, Apple is taking the same approach which these chips as they do the iPhones and iPads. Just one SKU (excluding the X variants), which is the same across all iDevices (aside from maybe slight clock speed differences occasionally).

EDIT:

Screen-Shot-2021-10-18-at-1.20.47-PM.jpg

M1 Pro 8-core CPU (6+2), 14-core GPU
M1 Pro 10-core CPU (8+2), 14-core GPU
M1 Pro 10-core CPU (8+2), 16-core GPU
M1 Max 10-core CPU (8+2), 24-core GPU
M1 Max 10-core CPU (8+2), 32-core GPU

M1 Pro and M1 Max discussion here:


M1 Ultra discussion here:


M2 discussion here:


Second Generation 5 nm
Unified memory architecture - LPDDR5, up to 24 GB and 100 GB/s
20 billion transistors

8-core CPU

4 high-performance cores
192 KB instruction cache
128 KB data cache
Shared 16 MB L2 cache

4 high-efficiency cores
128 KB instruction cache
64 KB data cache
Shared 4 MB L2 cache

10-core iGPU (but there is an 8-core variant)
3.6 Teraflops

16-core neural engine
Secure Enclave
USB 4

Hardware acceleration for 8K h.264, h.264, ProRes

M3 Family discussion here:


M4 Family discussion here:

 
Last edited:

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
23,825
1,396
126
Apple already said RCS will be green. What part of "blue is for iMessage" do people not get?
I figured as much but didn’t realize they had actually announced that part already. However, ironically, for years I used SMS on my iPhone because iMessage had significant growing pains when it first came out. But now it is key, and we are an all iPhone household, partially for the sake of iMessage and Live Photos.

We are also still on a multi Apple AirPort Extreme (circa 2013) 802.11ac wireless network at home, since it works well and supports all our Apple devices with seamless handoff, even though seamless handoff wasn't even advertised as a feature with these. I suspect the reason it wasn't advertised was because its seamless handoff does NOT work with Android, Linux, and Windows devices, only Apple devices. So far I haven't felt the need to upgrade to 802.11ax, esp. considering most of our WiFi client devices don't support that standard anyway. That makes this WiFi network a decade old now, and I could see us still using it 5 years from now, given the advantages it has for our primarily Apple household. We do have several non-Apple WiFi client devices, but since they are all non-mobile devices, the lack of seamless handoff with those is moot.

Overall, this hardware and software integration is a real advantage for our purposes, but it can also have some disadvantages too sometimes of course.
 

Doug S

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2020
2,785
4,750
136
I figured as much but didn’t realize they had actually announced that part already. However, ironically, for years I used SMS on my iPhone because iMessage had significant growing pains when it first came out. But now it is key, and we are an all iPhone household, partially for the sake of iMessage and Live Photos.

I remember iMessage being a pain initially because of its reliance on data. If you were on a highly congested cell (common back in the day, especially if you were in a place with a lot of people) your iMessages might take ages to get through since voice is prioritized over data. But SMS could get through because it used the cellular control link that was less overwhelmed, so if I was at a football game or crowded mall I'd have to turn off iMessage.
 

StinkyPinky

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2002
6,886
1,103
126
Imagine some bimbo not dating you because on her $300 iphone SE she gets a green bubble from your $1500 android phone and thinks you're cheap.

Dodged a bullet for sure.
 

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
3,952
2,376
106
Was the M1 GPU bottlenecked by limited Memory bandwidth?

The Apple M1 has 68 GB/s of Memory Bandwidth, which looks quite bad just 3 years later.

That came from LPDDR4X-4266 RAM mated to a 128 bit memory bus.

Just 3 years later (today), we have phone SoCs with LPDDR5X-8533 mated to 64 bit buses, hitting 68 GB/s. And then some with LPDDRT-9600 going as high as 76 GB/s.
 

Doug S

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2020
2,785
4,750
136
Was the M1 GPU bottlenecked by limited Memory bandwidth?

The Apple M1 has 68 GB/s of Memory Bandwidth, which looks quite bad just 3 years later.

Bottlenecked in what sort of situations, exactly?

I'm sure one could come up with benchmarks where that is a bottleneck, but how often would that be run into in the real world? If it is something you would rarely see, who cares? If it is something you would see often then sure it matters, but I remember when M1 came out everyone was talking about how much memory bandwidth it had compared to pretty much every other integrated (and a lot of lower end discrete) GPUs. Three years later it "looks quite bad"? Technology marches on, so older stuff will always be behind. When that stop happening the tech market is in big trouble.

Theoretically Apple could have pushed LPDDR5 into it to get it 100 GBps, but then people would be complaining that M2 didn't get an upgrade over M1 (you know, like people have complained about M3 not getting a memory type upgrade over M2...)

I imagine M4 will use LPDDR5X and get 133 GBps, and people will complain "why not use 5T and get 150...."
 

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
3,952
2,376
106
Well here's how it should've been.

Here me out.

M1 series = LPDDR4X-4266
M2 series = LPDDR5-5500
M3 series = LPDDR5-6400
M4 series = LPDDR5X-7500
M5 series = LPDDR5X-8533
M6 series = LPDDR5T-9600
M7 series = LPDDR6-?????

You are welcome to react with 'Haha'.
 
Jul 27, 2020
20,040
13,740
146
Well here's how it should've been.

Here me out.

M1 series = LPDDR4X-4266
M2 series = LPDDR5-5500
M3 series = LPDDR5-6400
M4 series = LPDDR5X-7500
M5 series = LPDDR5X-8533
M6 series = LPDDR5T-9600
M7 series = LPDDR6-?????

You are welcome to react with 'Haha'.
All wrong (no offense!). If it "should've been", then all M series CPUs should've had HBM2 minimum. Apple can afford it and buying in volume, they could even have gotten the base model to start at 12GB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Mopetar

gdansk

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2011
2,967
4,498
136
That's an unfortunate rumor, I was hoping the other rumor that they'd put modems in their laptops was true. Well I guess it could still be true? But it seems less likely if it isn't Apple's modem.

I was hoping for a future MBA 15 with notch-less OLED display and an integrated 5G modem.
 

Doug S

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2020
2,785
4,750
136
If that's true they should go to Mediatek and offer to buy the rights to their modem. Pay them enough that they can have all the IP for the design, baseband software, plus a forever license to all their cellular patents at the time of purchase. Might cost them another billion or two, but then they can take that design forward as their own modem in the future.

I don't see why Mediatek wouldn't be willing to do such a deal. Apple is not really a competitor of theirs, and all else being equal it is probably better for them if Apple doesn't continue using Qualcomm modems indefinitely as that only strengthens their biggest competitor in Android SoCs. So it would basically be free money, plus weakening of their chief competitor, a win/win for Mediatek.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and scannall

Glo.

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2015
5,803
4,777
136
The real reason why Apple developed their own modem was corporate espionage of technical details of Qualcomm modems, and the ease of development of software like Pegasus.

Any non-custom solutions will not ease this problem for Apple.
 

Doug S

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2020
2,785
4,750
136
The real reason why Apple developed their own modem was corporate espionage of technical details of Qualcomm modems, and the ease of development of software like Pegasus.

Any non-custom solutions will not ease this problem for Apple.

That's why I said ALL IP from Mediatek, including the baseband firmware. They can audit it themselves for any security issues, and fix them on their own schedules.

The one security exploit used by NSO that was fully detailed by Google Zero did not involve the baseband - it involved five separate bugs that were chained together to allow owning the device. That doesn't mean there aren't baseband issues that are exploited (or that Qualcomm's baseband doesn't have security "holes" known to intelligence agencies like the NSA) but we don't have any proof that Pegasus has relied on baseband exploits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and scannall

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
3,952
2,376
106
A: LPDDR5-6400 + 256-bit bus

B: LPDDR5X-8533 + 192-bit bus

Both have 200 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Which combination is more expensive?
 

Doug S

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2020
2,785
4,750
136
CNBC did an interview/video about Apple's chip design process. No new information, but does include a peek inside Apple's chip lab, supposedly the first time journalists have been allowed to film inside (so obviously they hid everything we'd really love to see) but does include a few tidbits about the way they test new chips.

https://www.cnbc.com/video/2023/12/...hips-for-iphone-and-mac-edging-out-intel.html
 

Saylick

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2012
3,532
7,859
136
CNBC did an interview/video about Apple's chip design process. No new information, but does include a peek inside Apple's chip lab, supposedly the first time journalists have been allowed to film inside (so obviously they hid everything we'd really love to see) but does include a few tidbits about the way they test new chips.

https://www.cnbc.com/video/2023/12/...hips-for-iphone-and-mac-edging-out-intel.html
Wait wait wait. So you're telling me that Apple's silicon labs doesn't look like this?! Color me shocked!

1701463942292.png

/s
 

Doug S

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2020
2,785
4,750
136
Wait wait wait. So you're telling me that Apple's silicon labs doesn't look like this?! Color me shocked!

View attachment 89633

/s

I'm sure the engineers aren't sitting inside the same room as all those test machines are running, but also aren't sitting in that CGI design studio in the picture above - if for no other reason than many people aren't going to want to spend 8 hours a sitting in one of those backless chairs!