Apple Said to Be Exploring Switch From Intel for Mac

grimpr

Golden Member
Aug 21, 2007
1,095
7
81
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...ring-switch-from-intel-chips-for-the-mac.html

Apple Inc. (AAPL) is exploring ways to replace Intel Corp. (INTC) processors in its Mac personal computers with a version of the chip technology it uses in the iPhone and iPad, according to people familiar with the company’s research.

Apple engineers have grown confident that the chip designs used for its mobile devices will one day be powerful enough to run its desktops and laptops, said three people with knowledge of the work, who asked to remain anonymous because the plans are confidential. Apple began using Intel chips for Macs in 2005.
 

gevorg

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2004
5,075
1
0
Guess Charlie had a point, even with all the rage against him. Anyway, the merge of iOS and OSX is inevitable. Intel still has time for a major turnaround in their mobile offerings.
 

podspi

Golden Member
Jan 11, 2011
1,965
71
91
This really isn't much of a surprise, and Apple is right, one day they will be powerful enough.

I think the real interesting question is what timeframe are they planning on having this done, and what are they going to do about the fact that by that time ARM CPUs are powerful enough to comfortably run laptops, there will likely be x86-based portables that look just as nice, and get 'good enough' (anything longer than 12hrs is just gravy) battery life that the extra performance of x86 is preferable?
 

Ferzerp

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,438
107
106
one day they will be powerful enough.

That depends. Eventually they will be as powerful as today's x86, yes (probably in around a decade), but will today's hardware be enough to run the applications of 2022? That is by no means a given.

Bleeding edge has always seemed very fast, but year after year, the bar gets raised as well. What we felt was crazy fast in 2002 is laughable now (and is actually where ARM currently is).
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
That depends. Eventually they will be as powerful as today's x86, yes (probably in around a decade), but will today's hardware be enough to run the applications of 2022? That is by no means a given.

Bleeding edge has always seemed very fast, but year after year, the bar gets raised as well. What we felt was crazy fast in 2002 is laughable now (and is actually where ARM currently is).
I think the really big question is, "how much money and time will it take to stay a few years behind bleeding edge?" Today, Core 2 would be the performance to shoot for. In 2-3 years, Nehalem. And so on. I wonder, if you plotted R&D cost v. performance at any given time (get out yer 3D graphing software! :)), how many years you'd have to stay back to remain at or under the knee on that curve?

ARM themselves are pulled in too many directions. But, I could see a company like nVidia, Samsung, or Apple developing ARM CPUs far enough behind bleeding edge to not break them, but not a decade behind PCs, ether. Around 5 years behind would be enough for the majority of the consumer market.
 

Tsavo

Platinum Member
Sep 29, 2009
2,645
37
91
Well, considering where Apple is going with their desktop apps, and how quickly they are adding performance to their ARM ISA parts, it's no stretch of the imagination to think that in four or five years a custom Apple designed ARM cpu will be enough to handle the all the needs of Apple's leisure computing devices.
 

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,208
1,580
136
That won't happen anytime in the near future simply because ARM is just so much slower than even ulv intel offerings. While Apple would probably be the only company that could get away with selling crappy hardware at a high price here the difference is just too big. Especially in the productivity sector they would never ever get away with it. I mean your 3 year old Mac will be double the speed as a new one. No one in their right mind would buy new for years.
 

VulgarDisplay

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2009
6,193
2
76
That won't happen anytime in the near future simply because ARM is just so much slower than even ulv intel offerings. While Apple would probably be the only company that could get away with selling crappy hardware at a high price here the difference is just too big. Especially in the productivity sector they would never ever get away with it. I mean your 3 year old Mac will be double the speed as a new one. No one in their right mind would buy new for years.

The trade off being that the battery would run for about 10 days instead of 2 hours.
 

bradley

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2000
3,671
2
81
Apple either underestimates the Intel juggernaut or is truly ignorant. Nobody is catching up, not even the Chinese. This has to be a strategic (almost coercive) maneuver to eke out higher profit margins from suppliers like Intel.
 

Tsavo

Platinum Member
Sep 29, 2009
2,645
37
91
Apple either underestimates the Intel juggernaut or is truly ignorant. Nobody is catching up, not even the Chinese. This has to be a strategic (almost coercive) maneuver to eke out higher profit margins from suppliers like Intel.

ARM ISA isn't going to become a replacement for Intel, not across the board. But if you look at what Apple is becoming, which is a provider of a platform for leisure computing, then they won't need to focus on providing products with 100+Gflop CPU's.

IMO, what Apple is wondering is what will it take to make ARM ISA a viable replacement for their laptops and desktop parts, since their focus clearly isn't on high performance computing anymore.
 

HypX

Member
Oct 25, 2002
72
0
0
Any gamer will tell you, the CPU is very much secondary to the GPU in gaming performance. I imagine that if the goal is something for watching movies, web browsing, light gaming, etc., the CPU only has to be fast to run the OS and GUI smoothly and that's pretty much it. As long as the GPU they put in it is fast, I don't think anyone would notice much of any downgrade in performance.
 
Last edited:

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106

MisterMac

Senior member
Sep 16, 2011
777
0
0
What i found ironic about this is - i'm sure whomever is designing ARM SOCs and custom cores within Apple wants this to happen.

More profits, same ISA - it's natural.



What i find ironic is - it will pretty much kill off they're original resurgance market of "creative professionals".

Which means all the hipsters that made them a popular quality lined product will be forced to leave them - as they become what... Acer?


Which i'll put my nutsack down on happening if apple ever switches.
They can't sustain the whole brand image - if they drop the 1 inside component that makes sure the experience they're trying to sell is seamless to the consumer.


I kinda hope it happens for apple's own dooms sake.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
ARM A15 is still lightyears behind any intel desktop offering, even old Core Duos.

ARM has a long way to go before they can topple x86 for the desktop
 

OBLAMA2009

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2008
6,574
3
0
this is old news. obviously they would like to make their own chips like they do for ipad but arm performance is so far off from intel that they couldnt afford to do this in the near future. you cant just come out with something significantly lower performance and sell it as an upgrade
 

Arg Clin

Senior member
Oct 24, 2010
416
0
76
Ofcourse Apple is exploring ways to replace Intel. Seems kinda obvious. What's interesting is that they need to go public with it.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Ofcourse Apple is exploring ways to replace Intel. Seems kinda obvious. What's interesting is that they need to go public with it.

Probably just a bargaining chip with Intel for a better price.

Apple: "We want a better price or we are switching to a competitor!"
Intel: "What competitors?"
Intel: "Trollface.jpg"
 

dma0991

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2011
2,723
1
0
Pretty much, if they want to be able to compete against Windows 8.
Windows 8 isn't even a worthy competitor. There is no unanimous agreement that W8 is the best successor to W7. If iOS and Mac OSX were to merge the way that W8 did, it will suffer the same backlash.
 

Dribble

Platinum Member
Aug 9, 2005
2,076
611
136
ARM A15 is still lightyears behind any intel desktop offering, even old Core Duos.

ARM has a long way to go before they can topple x86 for the desktop

The google chromebook review showed the A15 to be faster then the old atom one. A custom apple A15 would be even quicker. I wouldn't be surprised if the macbook air started using one of them. Apple would save a lot of money and gain a lot of flexibility if they could dump Intel/x86.

As for desktop - do apple even have desktop pc's these days?
 

Arg Clin

Senior member
Oct 24, 2010
416
0
76
Probably just a bargaining chip with Intel for a better price.

Apple: "We want a better price or we are switching to a competitor!"
Intel: "What competitors?"
Intel: "Trollface.jpg"
That's also my guess. The question here is if Intel can eat a discount large enough to keep Apple motivated not to develop a competing product.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
That's also my guess. The question here is if Intel can eat a discount large enough to keep Apple motivated not to develop a competing product.

Apple could use 10 years and 25billion$ and not even reach Intel speeds.

And Apple can never sell enough on its own to be profitable that way. Not to mention Apple is having a continuel pressure froms tock owners to pay up, specially after the 120$ stockloss the last 50 days.
 

tommo123

Platinum Member
Sep 25, 2005
2,617
48
91
^. apple would still be limited by TSMC/Samsung no? unless they go into the fab game but to even come close to intel would cost 10s of billions just to build the fabs i think. let alone the R&D to do it

best i can think of is that (afaik apple was in on the ground floor of open CL?) they want to have more run on the gpu maybe via directcompute or some such? if enough can be run that way, then even desktops could run ok (for mac users i mean) with a decent gpu and maybe 2 quad A15s?