• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

APPLE people actually do think different.

/me sticks foot in mac riceboy community's collective butts

Your G4-450 is fast enough. A G4-1.4 Isn't going to make a rat's ass of a difference. The only noticable performance scale in the mac world is G3-233=>G3-300 and inter-generation (m68k=>PPC, PPC=>G3, G3=>G4, G4=>G5)

Now, give me your old G4 so I can toss it in the place of my G3-233.
 
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
/me sticks foot in mac riceboy community's collective butts

Your G4-450 is fast enough. A G4-1.4 Isn't going to make a rat's ass of a difference. The only noticable performance scale in the mac world is G3-233=>G3-300 and inter-generation (m68k=>PPC, PPC=>G3, G3=>G4, G4=>G5)

Now, give me your old G4 so I can toss it in the place of my G3-233.

i'm guessing that more than tripling the clock speed would in fact make a difference. certainly a lot more than your measly 28% G3 example.
 
REALLY WIERD MAN! They talkin' 'bout "good manners"... WTFs that?

Ya don't see that commie @£$%X! in these PC groups. Makes ya feel weird when ya go home to beat up yer kids.

If PC users ever git an ejucashun ahm gittin out ma shotgun n' pumpin' the Dell fulla led!
 
OMG, who would brag about 1.25 GHz? That's pathetic...

EDIT: Oh, 1.4 GHz. Whatever, that's still nothing. Mac users suck.
 
I can't belive people turn an upgrade into an emotional event. It's not like the guy said "your kids are ugly" but from the responses, he might as well have. tards.
 
Originally posted by: hjo3
OMG, who would brag about 1.25 GHz? That's pathetic...

EDIT: Oh, 1.4 GHz. Whatever, that's still nothing. Mac users suck.
You're an idiot. Macworld's forum is a kiddie board that is not representative of the entire mac community. I suggest you look at real Mac forum like MacNN before you go making generalizations.
 
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
You're an idiot. Macworld's forum is a kiddie board that is not representative of the entire mac community. I suggest you look at real Mac forum like MacNN before you go making generalizations.
Yeah, but see, you're a Mac user, so I don't really want to bother listening to you.

Besides, why would I want to go hang out on Mac message boards? Ew.
🙂
 
Originally posted by: hjo3
OMG, who would brag about 1.25 GHz? That's pathetic...

EDIT: Oh, 1.4 GHz. Whatever, that's still nothing. Mac users suck.

It's not your clockspeed, it's how you use it. People getting into clockspeed wars look pretty stupid IMHO as a hardware engineer (in training at least). I blame Intel for encouraging that kind of stupid thinking.
 
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Originally posted by: hjo3
OMG, who would brag about 1.25 GHz? That's pathetic...

EDIT: Oh, 1.4 GHz. Whatever, that's still nothing. Mac users suck.
You're an idiot. Macworld's forum is a kiddie board that is not representative of the entire mac community. I suggest you look at real Mac forum like MacNN before you go making generalizations.

I concur and add some Bonus Flame for not knowing squat about processor architecture. 😛

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to take another dump on the fanboy kiddies at MacWorld before I return to my usual position crapping on them here.

- M4H
 
Remind me to introduce you ppl to a little phrase, "tongue in cheek."
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: nan0bug
repost.

Yeah, and I even quoted you there. 😉

- M4H

Hey, it's Forum Diarrhoea Man... 17,000 acts of mindless juvenility & still counting. M4H sorry man, didn't mean to suggest you can count, I know it's automated for you.
 
Originally posted by: beachbreeze
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: nan0bug
repost.

Yeah, and I even quoted you there. 😉

- M4H

Hey, it's Forum Diarrhoea Man... 17,000 acts of mindless juvenility & still counting. M4H sorry man, didn't mean to suggest you can count, I know it's automated for you.
1/10 on the attempted insult.
 
Originally posted by: beachbreeze
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: nan0bug
repost.

Yeah, and I even quoted you there. 😉

- M4H

Hey, it's Forum Diarrhoea Man... 17,000 acts of mindless juvenility & still counting. M4H sorry man, didn't mean to suggest you can count, I know it's automated for you.
What is your other user name?

 
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: beachbreeze
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: nan0bug
repost.

Yeah, and I even quoted you there. 😉

- M4H

Hey, it's Forum Diarrhoea Man... 17,000 acts of mindless juvenility & still counting. M4H sorry man, didn't mean to suggest you can count, I know it's automated for you.
What is your other user name?

Banny McBanned.

- M4H
 
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
/me sticks foot in mac riceboy community's collective butts

Your G4-450 is fast enough. A G4-1.4 Isn't going to make a rat's ass of a difference. The only noticable performance scale in the mac world is G3-233=>G3-300 and inter-generation (m68k=>PPC, PPC=>G3, G3=>G4, G4=>G5)

Now, give me your old G4 so I can toss it in the place of my G3-233.

i'm guessing that more than tripling the clock speed would in fact make a difference. certainly a lot more than your measly 28% G3 example.

I think that g3 example is when they moved from a 66mhz bus to a 100mhz bus. A mac is only as fast as it's bus.
 
Originally posted by: ZeroNine8
I can't belive people turn an upgrade into an emotional event. It's not like the guy said "your kids are ugly" but from the responses, he might as well have. tards.

When you have to pay so much money for such small gains then I guess I would be emotional too.
 
Back
Top