Apple Introduces Boot Camp to Run Windows XP on Macs

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
CUPERTINO, Calif., April 5, 2006 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- Apple(R)
today introduced Boot Camp, public beta software that enables Intel-based Macs
to run Windows XP. Available as a download beginning today, Boot Camp allows
users with a Microsoft Windows XP installation disc to install Windows XP on an
Intel-based Mac(R), and once installation is complete, users can restart their
computer to run either Mac OS(R) X or Windows XP. Boot Camp will be a feature in
"Leopard," Apple's next major release of Mac OS X, that will be previewed at
Apple's Worldwide Developer Conference in August.

"Apple has no desire or plan to sell or support Windows, but many customers have
expressed their interest to run Windows on Apple's superior hardware now that we
use Intel processors," said Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of
Worldwide Product Marketing. "We think Boot Camp makes the Mac even more
appealing to Windows users considering making the switch."

Boot Camp simplifies Windows installation on an Intel-based Mac by providing a
simple graphical step-by-step assistant application to dynamically create a
second partition on the hard drive for Windows, to burn a CD with all the
necessary Windows drivers, and to install Windows from a Windows XP installation
CD. After installation is complete, users can choose to run either Mac OS X or
Windows when they restart their computer.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/
 

SparkyJJO

Lifer
May 16, 2002
13,357
7
81
L=already posted]http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=38&threadid=1837180[/L]
and my opinion is who cares - if you want winXP buy a PC, why pay apple's inflated prices?
 

StratusFearX

Junior Member
Nov 23, 2001
15
0
0
Originally posted by: SparkyJJO
if you want winXP buy a PC, why pay apple's inflated prices?

Try doing some research. Apple's prices aren't inflated if you try to build the same machine feature for feature. Out of curiousity, one day I tried to spec out a machine with all the same stuff as an iMac, even down to the remote and camera. The Apple machine was cheaper. Why are PCs normally cheaper than Apples, though? Because they forego entire sets of features that Apple traditionally includes. That said, it's certainly not for everyone. I use most of the features my iMac has, but I know people who wouldn't use any of them and would be ok with a bargain basement PC (wouldn't they be better off if they could use OS X, though...)
 

d3lt4

Senior member
Jan 5, 2006
848
0
76
This is like the best news in a long time. I want to be able to dual boot to OS X on my desktop and this is one step in the right direction. Hurray!
 

remagavon

Platinum Member
Jun 16, 2003
2,516
0
0
Do NOT install this on a core duo imac. I lost my Mac file system by trying to install it, currently waiting for a response in the Apple forums.
 

StratusFearX

Junior Member
Nov 23, 2001
15
0
0
Originally posted by: remagavon
Do NOT install this on a core duo imac. I lost my Mac file system by trying to install it, currently waiting for a response in the Apple forums.

I installed on a Core Duo iMac. No problems.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,313
7
81
Originally posted by: StratusFearX
Originally posted by: remagavon
Do NOT install this on a core duo imac. I lost my Mac file system by trying to install it, currently waiting for a response in the Apple forums.

I installed on a Core Duo iMac. No problems.

Me too. Installing HL2 right now!
 

remagavon

Platinum Member
Jun 16, 2003
2,516
0
0
Originally posted by: Childs
Originally posted by: StratusFearX
Originally posted by: remagavon
Do NOT install this on a core duo imac. I lost my Mac file system by trying to install it, currently waiting for a response in the Apple forums.

I installed on a Core Duo iMac. No problems.

Me too. Installing HL2 right now!

Hit and miss so far. Only 2 horrible failures on the imac, one of which was mine. A few people wrecked their file system on the macbook pro somehow too.
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
Originally posted by: StratusFearX
Originally posted by: SparkyJJO
if you want winXP buy a PC, why pay apple's inflated prices?

Try doing some research. Apple's prices aren't inflated if you try to build the same machine feature for feature. Out of curiousity, one day I tried to spec out a machine with all the same stuff as an iMac, even down to the remote and camera. The Apple machine was cheaper. Why are PCs normally cheaper than Apples, though? Because they forego entire sets of features that Apple traditionally includes. That said, it's certainly not for everyone. I use most of the features my iMac has, but I know people who wouldn't use any of them and would be ok with a bargain basement PC (wouldn't they be better off if they could use OS X, though...)

I have done the research, Apple computers cost hundreds of dollars more even at the low-end. If you don't get an apple for MacOS, then there's no point. Even then, I don't see any reason to choose Mac OS over Windows.

The most ridiculous thing I've seen yet is their spokesperson calling it "Apple's superior hardware". That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard a spokesperson say.
 

remagavon

Platinum Member
Jun 16, 2003
2,516
0
0
Originally posted by: Malak
Originally posted by: StratusFearX
Originally posted by: SparkyJJO
if you want winXP buy a PC, why pay apple's inflated prices?

Try doing some research. Apple's prices aren't inflated if you try to build the same machine feature for feature. Out of curiousity, one day I tried to spec out a machine with all the same stuff as an iMac, even down to the remote and camera. The Apple machine was cheaper. Why are PCs normally cheaper than Apples, though? Because they forego entire sets of features that Apple traditionally includes. That said, it's certainly not for everyone. I use most of the features my iMac has, but I know people who wouldn't use any of them and would be ok with a bargain basement PC (wouldn't they be better off if they could use OS X, though...)

I have done the research, Apple computers cost hundreds of dollars more even at the low-end. If you don't get an apple for MacOS, then there's no point. Even then, I don't see any reason to choose Mac OS over Windows.

The most ridiculous thing I've seen yet is their spokesperson calling it "Apple's superior hardware". That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard a spokesperson say.

Take marketing 101. :p
 

halfadder

Golden Member
Dec 5, 2004
1,190
0
0
I can only speak on behalf of the academic prices, as I work in the academic sector. Several of the people in my department have bought MacBookPro systems since the first XP install hack was announced. We are able to buy the regular model MacBookPro upgraded to 1 GB RAM for $1849, shipping included. Our university already has a site license for XP so that is already covered. There are some cheaper notebooks out there with similar specs, but when we looked over the whole package, it was a no-brainer.

$1849 for a 1 inch thick notebook with 15" wide screen, dual core intel chip, 1 GB RAM, X1600 graphics (not integrated crap), DVD burner, webcam, remote control, iLife software bundle, xCode developer software, Unix under the hood, gigabit ethernet, optical audio in/out, backlit keyboard, 802.11g, bluetooth2.0edr, PCIexpresscard34 slot...and now, the ability to run Windows XP.

What REALLY clinched the deal? The magnetic power connector!! If you trip over the power cord, it comes loose instantly! Most regular notebook power adapters cost $60 - $150, so you'll save some good money if you're the type that trips over cords on a regular basis!

And we used that "money savings" to buy snazzy laser wireless bluetooth mice! :)
 

StratusFearX

Junior Member
Nov 23, 2001
15
0
0
Originally posted by: Malak
I have done the research, Apple computers cost hundreds of dollars more even at the low-end. If you don't get an apple for MacOS, then there's no point. Even then, I don't see any reason to choose Mac OS over Windows.

I assume you're referring to the Mac mini. Yes, a 6x6 box (the Mac mini) costs more than a minitower from Dell that consumes a good bit more space. None of the PCs as small beat the Mac mini on price. The closest competitor on size and features was some AOpen box that was slower and cost over $1000. That and the Mac mini has a lot more and better included software.

I could list plenty of good reasons to choose Mac OS over Windows, but most people don't want to hear it.