Apple really pushes OpenCL? Final Cut Pro is about the only major product from Apple that uses OpenCL from what I have seen. I'd guess the real reason is AMD gave Apple a deal they couldn't resist. You know, why AMD's margins will remain 50% lower than their competition.
I never thought of that you could be right.Second is the... Freesync technology. Retina 4K and 5K Thunderbolt Displays...
Apple + All 3 consoles means AMD has a constant revenue stream to stay alive. Profits be damned, they just need revenue. They are surely undercutting Nvidia by a lot, but they really have to.
There's a lot of OpenCL in OSX, like the new Photos app. The trend seem to indicate that you will not be able to use OSX in the future without OpenCL.
Not a problem for most "normal" OSX users, but for those (like myself) that use Hackintosh, this could be a problem (aka less choice in GPU)
You are comparing desktop chips to mobiles? The 750Ti is not a mobile chip, its performance does not represent a 750M.
Also nVidia's OpenCL performance does not compare to AMDs, and the fact that they JUST NOW started to support OpenCL 1.2 (Which AMD supported YEARS AGO) is another issue. Apple has been pushing for 2.0 support, which Intel and AMD have.
I wonder how much of this has to do with Nvidia's patent lawsuits.
I cant believe they are charging $500 to upgrade from intel iris to a lowly M370X. They are basically shaving $100 off the cpu cost and adding a $200 gpu for a total net cost of $100 and gouging the heck out of the consumer for $400.
The equivalent mobile chips (860m/850m/960m/950m) all use the same die at different clocks. It does not represent a 750m but the next gen replacement of the 750m.
They use the same die, but they aren't at all the same save for different clocks. The mobile parts are heavily cut down, either with purposefully disabled cores or those parts that didn't pass inspection for their higher-revenue parts.
There is absolutely nothing cut down about the 860m and 960m. The 850m and 950m are also fully enabled GM107 parts but with DDR3.
Mobile is higher binned and higher revenue that desktop. Some may be cut down but even then the higher end cut down chips end up in mobile.
GM107 doesn't even exist in the desktop, so there I guess you can say they are mobile-specific and at least one model is sure to be fully enabled.
Of course they exist on the desktop. The first GM107 releases were the GTX 750 and GTX 750 Ti.
With the great efficiency of Maxwell, I really dont understand why Apple went back to AMD, unless like others said it has to deal with open GL vs CUDA. Either that or there is something political going on behind the scenes.
The new MacBook Pro is supposed to be on sale today, isn't it? I'm surprised we don't have any benchmarks yet. No one seems to know for sure what the R9 M370X is; all we have is a questionable benchmark chart from an old rumor.
I think it would be great if the R9 M370X is a new chip, but I suspect it's probably just Bonaire.
People are still recycling this old argument which doesn't pan out.
![]()
Agreed - even Intel/nVidia users should be hoping for a profitable AMD. Competition benefits all consumers.Apple + All 3 consoles means AMD has a constant revenue stream to stay alive. Profits be damned, they just need revenue. They are surely undercutting Nvidia by a lot, but they really have to.
5K support will rule that rebadge out. It's either a cut down Tonga (unlikely due to the TDP associated on that platform!!) or a new chip using GCN 1.2+
