Apparently Wind Farms cause global warming, lol?

Discussion in 'Politics and News' started by bfdd, Apr 30, 2012.

  1. CycloWizard

    CycloWizard Lifer

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2001
    Messages:
    12,352
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not necessarily. We are essentially taking energy out of the air at the wind farm and converting it to heat at the point of use.
     
  2. Ninjahedge

    Ninjahedge Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    4,146
    Likes Received:
    0
    The amount of energy in the atmosphere is well above what can be easily extracted.

    You start taking too much out, the Earths rotation itself will start restoring the lost kinetic energy.

    Again, we are talking extremes. As much as man likes to think of himself as oh so powerful, the only things we seem to be able to do that genuinely effects the world as we know it is poisoning it.

    There, a little goes a LONG way. (CFC's)
     
  3. BoberFett

    BoberFett Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 1999
    Messages:
    37,587
    Likes Received:
    3
    Yep, but world climate is a complex system. You pull a massive amount of solar energy from the desert and move it to CA you've altered the system. You remove tidal energy and move it to NY you've altered the system. Yes, the energy in the whole system is the same, but you've changed its distribution. Would it be enough to alter climate in a noticeable way? Hard to say.
     
  4. BoberFett

    BoberFett Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 1999
    Messages:
    37,587
    Likes Received:
    3
    So humans are too insignificant to alter the atmosphere. Unless we use oil and coal in which case WE'RE KILLING THE PLANET!!!!
     
  5. hal2kilo

    hal2kilo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    6,499
    Likes Received:
    234
    After thinking about it, other than mixing the warmer and cooler air at the lowest level of the atmosphere, I doubt that a wind turbine extracts any energy as heat or it's insignificant. On the other hand I would think that virtually all of the energy is extracted as mechanical energy. Now getting back to conservation of energy, I assume that the wind is mostly derived from air currents generated by heat energy plus a little bit from the earths rotation. I've got to believe in the big picture of things that if you took all of the energy that's available in the air column, let say a 200ft diameter cylinder including the wind turbine that extends to the stratophere , that the wind turbine is still extracting an infinitesimal amount of energy from that air column.
     
  6. Ninjahedge

    Ninjahedge Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    4,146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, yes.
     
  7. DaveSimmons

    DaveSimmons Elite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2001
    Messages:
    39,452
    Likes Received:
    237
    I guess this proves the climate change deniers right, and man-made global warming can't possibly exist . . . .oh, wait.
     
  8. BoberFett

    BoberFett Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 1999
    Messages:
    37,587
    Likes Received:
    3
    Religious zealots are funny. Your reasoning changes drastically depending on what point you're trying to prove.
     
  9. Doppel

    Doppel Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    13,313
    Likes Received:
    1
    This news is extremely questionable to me. For reasons I imagine already mentioned in this thread.
     
  10. Throckmorton

    Throckmorton Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you have zero common sense?

    We've increased CO2 in the atmosphere by 50% by burning fossil fuels. We've destroyed a huge portion of the world's forests. We've caused many species to go extinct. We've significantly altered marine ecosystems and continue to do so, to the point that every few years we have to change the species of fish that we buy in grocery stores. Oh and BTW, pregnant women can no longer eat fish because we've made them toxic. It's not up for debate whether we've had a huge impact on the earth.

    Extracting energy from the wind doesn't have any significant impact on global climate. If you think it does, it's because you don't grasp the quantities of energy involved.


    This is a troll article to begin with. Mixing air is NOT global warming. Do the fans in your house reduce the temperature? I'm surprised Forbes would publish garbage like this.
     
  11. VirtualLarry

    VirtualLarry Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    36,432
    Likes Received:
    906
    Finally, someone who gets it. Chaos Theory study FTW.
     
  12. monovillage

    monovillage Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    8,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    All I want is for you personally to have to pay the cost of electricity we get from wind power and to have to depend solely on it to provide the energy needs of your life.

    For myself I'll stick with hydro and gas/coal.
     
  13. Ninjahedge

    Ninjahedge Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    4,146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nope.

    Scientists know the difference between kinetic energy, thermodynamics, and biochemical interactions.

    Try again.
     
  14. Ninjahedge

    Ninjahedge Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    4,146
    Likes Received:
    0
    IFF you then take and keep all the waste products that are produced by this in and around your person and property.

    If what you desire effects others adversely, they have the right to ask for regulations.
     
  15. monovillage

    monovillage Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    8,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have no problem with that at all. As long as they can prove it.
     
  16. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe we should limit the amount of CO liberals can exhale....you know, to save the planet. The planet will be better off in many ways if we do this.

    :)
     
  17. ShawnD1

    ShawnD1 Lifer

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    16,000
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't like to say that most people are high school drop outs since that's clearly not true. What is most likely true that is a large percentage of people are on PCP when doing their work.

    For example, the article is about mixing hot air with cold air and getting an average between the two. Simple math would say that temperatures like 10 on the ground and 20 in the air have the same average as having 15 on the ground and 15 in the air. After smoking PCP, you'll clearly see that the average changes from 15 to 90. Therefore the windmills and PCP caused global warming.
     
  18. NikolaeVarius

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    11,036
    Likes Received:
    3
    That's a very VERY dumb argument.

    The true costs of using fossil fuels is extremely high and there are a massive amount of externalities associated with fossil fuels. In fact, if externalities are included with the cost of using coal, it quickly would become too expensive to justify the cost of using it.
     
    #43 NikolaeVarius, May 2, 2012
    Last edited: May 2, 2012
  19. monovillage

    monovillage Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    8,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    of course it is, and hydro too.
     
  20. Matt1970

    Matt1970 Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    12,323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wrong - The ground releases heat energy captured during daylight hours.

    Wrong. those are turbines, not propellers.
     
  21. Ninjahedge

    Ninjahedge Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    4,146
    Likes Received:
    0
    They can, and they have.

    By "it" you mean Global Warming (or climate change) and the majority of scientists agree that there has been change recently. That change has paced our own industrial development and production of waste material.

    Somehow ignoring the previous examples of CFC, TFC's and other chemicals and their effect on the environment and still shouting "prove it" when your life or livelyhood would NOT be greatly effected (waah, you have to spend more for luxury) is a bit duplicitous.

    The key here is simple. You have every right to question things, but when that questioning turns to obfuscation rather than a true attempt at enlightenment, then you are simply being an impediment and not a solution.
     
  22. monovillage

    monovillage Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    8,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    No they haven't in terms of preventable catastrophic, but knock yourself out. Enlightenment my ass. If you can prove it, then do it. BTW if you want a decent response to the OP you can try this article.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...4/30/gIQAMl2GsT_blog.html?tid=pm_business_pop
     
    #47 monovillage, May 2, 2012
    Last edited: May 4, 2012