Apollo Lake (Platform) / Goldmont (CPU core Codename) Info

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

zentan

Member
Jan 23, 2015
177
5
36
Seems that Apollo Lake went up on wattage required. At least jumped from 4 to 6 and is a good sign.
Also the base clock might be higher.

Is on par of Stoney Ridge.
Err...4core parts like n3710 have 6W TDP already, nothing changes in the specified TDP for 4Core part cited in the slide in that regard.
 

SAAA

Senior member
May 14, 2014
541
126
116
fba51389d7b4f1e0dfbaca03f8b7fdbf


That's a tiny soc... and +30% performance at same clock is nice too, just cranck em up to 3GHz and Atom might finally reach the old core quad ;)
 
Mar 10, 2006
11,715
2,012
126
So, clue me in, has this chip been cancelled? Are all Atom CPUs dead? Or just the phone / tablet-oriented ones?

I just bought some Gigabyte Brix J1900 mini-PCs, and I think that they're great. If Intel could release a quad-core Atom, with low TDP, and close to Core2Quad IPC, and an iGPU that could decode HEVC and VP9, and possibly with 4K decode / output and HDMI2.0, they would have a REALLY potent media-consumption / web-browser / HTPC box using that CPU.

It's confusing. The SoCs/platforms using the Atom CPU cores targeted at smartphones and iPad-like tablets have been cancelled. Atom core development itself continues and we will see future low cost PC processors based on future Atom CPU cores.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,352
10,050
126
That's a tiny soc... and +30% performance at same clock is nice too, just cranck em up to 3GHz and Atom might finally reach the old core quad ;)
That would be sweet. A nice little compact mini-PC, with the CPU performance of a Q6600 in a 20W unit. (Entire system power - the CPU would of course use a bit less.)
 

dealcorn

Senior member
May 28, 2011
247
4
76
I find this Geekbench comparison interesting.

N4200 Win-32bit 1416 4553
Q6600 Win-32bit 1287 3421

It appears the stock clock Goldmont N4200 outperforms the venerable, stock clock Q6600 by 10% in single threaded performance and by ~30% in Multithreaded performance. It may help make the low end desktop a more livable place.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,637
10,855
136
In Geekbench anyway. I'd like to see a broader spectrum of benchmarks but who really benches Core2Quad anymore?