AP source: Deficit to be $1.58 trillion this year

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
AP source: Federal deficit to reach $1.58 trillion for fiscal year

* By Philip Elliott, Associated Press Writer
* On Wednesday August 19, 2009, 8:33 pm EDT

o
Buzz up! 0
o Print

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The White House plans to announce the federal deficit is about $262 billion less than officials predicted earlier this year -- in part because the administration has provided less aid than expected to Wall Street.

The federal deficit this year will total $1.58 trillion, a senior White House official said late Wednesday. That's three times more red ink than last year. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the report before its release next Tuesday while President Barack Obama will be on vacation in Massachusetts.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office is expected to release its mid-session review the same day. It estimated in June that it expected a deficit of $1.825 trillion.

The report for the budget year that ends Sept. 30 also will predict Washington to spend $3.653 trillion this year, the official said. Revenue, however, would reach only $2.074 trillion.

The midsummer report was supposed to have been released in mid-July, but was delayed, leading to speculation the White House was delaying the bad news until Congress left on an August recess. Other administrations delayed releasing their versions of this report during their first year.

Obama's budget had included a $250 billion placeholder for a second bailout of the nation's troubled banks but did not ask Congress for it amid concerns the administration was spending too heavily. The administration also had anticipated more banks failing, but the survival of most banks saved billions for Washington.

The report comes during a rough patch for Obama's presidency. The rancor surrounding the Democrats' proposed health care overhaul came during a monthlong break when much of Washington is in a lull.

The administration earlier this year predicted that unemployment would peak at about 9 percent without a big stimulus package and 8 percent with one. Congress did pass a $787 billion two-year stimulus measure, yet unemployment soared to 9.4 percent in July and appears headed for double digits.

The nation's debt now stands at $11.7 trillion. In the scheme of things, that's more important than talking about the "deficit," which only looks at a one-year slice of bookkeeping and ignores previous debt that is still outstanding.

And the media will spin it as "Deficit to be ONLY $1.58 Trillion, as it comes in under estimates, they will perform fellatio around this number because projections were higher, and show how Obama has succeeded
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
The administration earlier this year predicted that unemployment would peak at about 9 percent without a big stimulus package and 8 percent with one. Congress did pass a $787 billion two-year stimulus measure, yet unemployment soared to 9.4 percent in July and appears headed for double digits.
And the CBO forecasted that the unemployment would hit 9% in early 2010.
http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=9957&type=1
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,697
6,257
126
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE



And the media will spin it as "Deficit to be ONLY $1.58 Trillion, as it comes in under estimates, they will perform fellatio around this number because projections were higher, and show how Obama has succeeded

It would seem they would be correct.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: blackangst1
God I miss the Bush spending :(

Why, we're still in Iraq

We have been since 2003, and it STILL hasn't cost us as much as the Obamanation has spent in less than one year.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: xj0hnx
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: blackangst1
God I miss the Bush spending :(

Why, we're still in Iraq

We have been since 2003, and it STILL hasn't cost us as much as the Obamanation has spent in less than one year.

The Bush administration *is* the source of the deficit this year.

Channel the anger at the deficit into demanding the cause of the problems be fixed.

That means the massive financial industry and other major corporate industries not dominating our economy and political system.

That's been the source - their getting deregulation on derivatives, their getting 'goverment corporate welfare' with things like Medicare drugs - by mostly Republicans, and some Democrats (including Clinton), causing the massive debt that does indeed transfer wealth from the public to the most wealthy, even while right-wing media especially, and corporate-owned media overall, continues to confuse many Americans about what's going on.

As long as they do, the American people will get nothing but more of the same, whether in more drastic measure from Republicans, or in minimizing the damage by Obama.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Today Buffet was saying how the huge deficit right now has the potential, down the road, to cause as big as problem as the current crisis.

Buffett, however, believes the "invisible" and "latent" threat of inflation could be "as ominous as that posed by the financial crisis itself."

and

With government expenditures now running 185 percent of receipts, truly major changes in both taxes and outlays will be required. A revived economy can't come close to bridging that sort of gap.

Link
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: xj0hnx
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: blackangst1
God I miss the Bush spending :(

Why, we're still in Iraq

We have been since 2003, and it STILL hasn't cost us as much as the Obamanation has spent in less than one year.

The Bush administration *is* the source of the deficit this year.

Channel the anger at the deficit into demanding the cause of the problems be fixed.

That means the massive financial industry and other major corporate industries not dominating our economy and political system.

That's been the source - their getting deregulation on derivatives, their getting 'goverment corporate welfare' with things like Medicare drugs - by mostly Republicans, and some Democrats (including Clinton), causing the massive debt that does indeed transfer wealth from the public to the most wealthy, even while right-wing media especially, and corporate-owned media overall, continues to confuse many Americans about what's going on.

As long as they do, the American people will get nothing but more of the same, whether in more drastic measure from Republicans, or in minimizing the damage by Obama.

The issue isn't government any more than the issue with a shooting is the gun - it's whose hands it's in and what they do with it. The gun can be quite useful in the police's hands.

What we need is the government in the hands of the public interest, restraining the harmful excesses of the most wealthy and powerful against the public interest.

Too many people now are misguidedly thinking that if they just cripple the government, the corporations will benevoloently fix the problems.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: blackangst1
God I miss the Bush spending :(

This still is the Bush spending. His admin wrote the budget for FY2009.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: blackangst1
God I miss the Bush spending :(

This still is the Bush spending. His admin wrote the budget for FY2009.

Yes, Im aware. This will be the last year of small deficits for quite awhile Im afraid. If the CBO is right anyway. We'll see what passes in Oct.

 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Today Buffet was saying how the huge deficit right now has the potential, down the road, to cause as big as problem as the current crisis.

Buffett, however, believes the "invisible" and "latent" threat of inflation could be "as ominous as that posed by the financial crisis itself."

and

With government expenditures now running 185 percent of receipts, truly major changes in both taxes and outlays will be required. A revived economy can't come close to bridging that sort of gap.

Link

Never let a good crisis go to waste?
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Originally posted by: Craig234
What we need is the government in the hands of the public interest, restraining the harmful excesses of the most wealthy and powerful against the public interest.

Too many people now are misguidedly thinking that if they just cripple the government, the corporations will benevoloently fix the problems.

Seriously, Mr. Genius-Craig-Who-Knows-Everything, how exactly do you change government? By electing Obama to President instead of the evil Republicans?

George Soros invests $811m in Petrobras
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/...01086&sid=aFHPjfeUvtl8

Obama gives $2b to Petrobras to drill for oil
http://online.wsj.com/article/...74346610120524166.html

Or is Soros the one "good" rich guy?


One of these days, yes Craig, you will come to the realization that your dream will never become reality, no matter how smart and determined you are in the voting booth. All power corrupts.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: blackangst1
God I miss the Bush spending :(

This still is the Bush spending. His admin wrote the budget for FY2009.

If it is Bush's budget, then why was it voted on in February with Obama as President?
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
When will all see clearly . Dems and Republican Leaders = SAME LIE. What does it take to convince you all? A yoke is that what its going to take?
 

Firebot

Golden Member
Jul 10, 2005
1,476
2
0
Even though this year was obviously a fluke year in terms of budget and the strong recession, I don't see Obama and Bush as being very different. Pork is pork. Democrats are not the saviours of America, and Obama can have the best of intentions, but it still doesn't matter that he is backed by a party just as corrupt as the Republicans. They simply cater to different industries.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: blackangst1
God I miss the Bush spending :(

This still is the Bush spending. His admin wrote the budget for FY2009.

If it is Bush's budget, then why was it voted on in February with Obama as President?

I'm sorry, who wrote it again?
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Wasnt the deficit for the last couple months close to 200 billion each? Thats an annual pace of 2.4 trillion, oof.