aol has 1st ever drop in subscribers

Zim Hosein

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Super Moderator
Nov 27, 1999
65,265
403
126
Originally posted by: OS
linky

I dunno, I haven't used AOL for years, does it still suck?

From what I've seen on rigs that my friends have, YES!.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
This is why pyramid schemes only work for the early members: eventually you run out of suckers.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,390
8,547
126
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
This is why pyramid schemes only work for the early members: eventually you run out of suckers.

gerald levine = biggest sucker ever
 

AvesPKS

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
4,729
0
0
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Everyone knows that it's better with the butterfly...

I swear, every time I see that thing, I think of the Mothman!
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,390
8,547
126
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Everyone knows that it's better with the butterfly...

if some guy in a leotard came up to me while i was chillin' in the shack with my homies and tuned off my NWA i'd cap him
 

T2T III

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,899
1
0
35 million subscribers doesn't necessarily equal 35 million paying subscribers. Doesn't AOL give people 1,000 free hours initially? I wonder how many of those 35 million subscribers are people in that first free month? Could it be as high as 5 million? :Q

Oh, to answer your question OS, yes, AOL, does still suck. AOL believes in overwhelming their users with a boat-load of information when they first sign on. Ugh! Then, their Internet pipeline is sooooooo slow - it takes many pages a long, long time to load. No, I don't have AOL, but have done enough work on the PCs of others who do have it.
 

thawolfman

Lifer
Dec 9, 2001
11,107
0
76
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: OS
linky

I dunno, I haven't used AOL for years, does it still suck?

From what I've seen on rigs that my friends have, YES!.

You mean they're still your friends even AFTER you see them with AOL!?

OMG...ZIM!?!? :p
 

KokomoGST

Diamond Member
Nov 13, 2001
3,758
0
0
AOL, there's no time to join a company that lost over 100 billion this past year... and hasn't made profit since... DID THEY EVER??
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,332
9,867
136
PREPARE FOR THE EXODUS!

HAHA those asses had it coming. We have roadrunner at home but my dad keeps AOL's 'bring your own access' plan cuz he HATES the idea of changing email addresses. So we buy a new laptop and I decide to upgrade dad to AOL 8.0. Go to the site, download the software, install. Then it sits and takes SIX minutes (no joke...on a P4 1.7ghz laptop!) to find the modem and ethernet adapter (drivers already installed in WinXP of course.) It asks us if we would like modem access, TCP/IP/LAN access, or 'Home Network' access. WTF? Isn't 'home network' the same as LAN? Oh well, we choose the usual TCP/IP. Start logging in...whoops, 'AOL is unable to find a network connection'. Weird, we just dl'ed this piece of sh!t from aol.com. Try turning on IE...WTF? AOL screwed up XP's network settings. Rerun XP network configuration wizard. Rerun AOL. Again AOL screws up. Rerun XP net config wizard, and use AOL in 'home network' mode. Still no go. And yet again it screws up XP's network settings! Uninstall. Install AOL 7.0. Setup for TCP/IP, and it works fine...

AOL 8.0 is a joke...
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
That's awesome. I think AOL is the sux. As the netzero commercial says "it's the same internet". I feel bad for anybody paying $20 to access the net over dialup.
 

Emrys

Golden Member
Jul 5, 2002
1,055
0
76
I don't think it is really a trend of people switching to MSN or NetZero, but rather people realizing that in paying about $24 a month for something slow they might aswell just pay the 40 and get something much faster . Web pages have more to load, the java programs are larger, everything is just growing, it is becoming so that it is a waste of your time, and frustrating to have dial-up.

Just my thoughts.

Emrys
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Emrys
I don't think it is really a trend of people switching to MSN or NetZero, but rather people realizing that in paying about $24 a month for something slow they might aswell just pay the 40 and get something much faster . Web pages have more to load, the java programs are larger, everything is just growing, it is becoming so that it is a waste of your time, and frustrating to have dial-up.

Just my thoughts.

Emrys
I had to use 56k the other day again and I can say that if I was a person used to it and then I came upon broadband one day I'd switch immediately. It's so freaking slow and $24/month for it is outrageous.

 

zCypher

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2002
6,115
171
116
Most dialup ISPs in my region charge maybe $7-9usd/month for unlimited 56k dialup with multiple email accounts, etc etc etc. It's definitely not worth it to pay $15-25/month for POS AOL. I wouldn't do that.