anyone wanna to explain this to me?

[Walleye]

alright, i was on IRC at diabloii.net... (irc.webmaster.com/diabloii)

and the mod dumbass says this:

"most strait guys are [word i cant remember, means something about being middle class, and having middle class ideas, conformity, whatever] anyway"

i asked him to explain, he said cause i'm strait, i wouldnt understand.

i pressed him on it, he wouldnt explain. i went on to say that homosexuals as a group on average are better off financially than heterosexuals, as that's the only thing i could think of (cause i couldnt understand this argument one bit)

I think i've caught him in a bind, and he has no fvcking clue what he's talking about (and probably flipped thru a dictionary to find a word that people wouldnt know so he could feel important).

anyone wanna try and finish his argument for him? explain this BS to me?

 

[MrAwesome]

no

 

[nan0bug]

It sounds to me like neither of you have the slightest clue what you're talking about, and are just arguing for the sake of arguing.

And I believe the word you are looking for is conservative.

 

[isaacmacdonald]

it seems that you have no idea what he was talking about, yet he's the dumbass. interesting.

 

[AnyMal]

yes

 

so did he convince you or what?

 

[Walleye]

he mispelled the word originally, i had to edit it before plugging it into the dictionary.. i assumed he meant phillistine, lacking social graces... but when i asked him about it, the middle class thing was the definition he quoted. (and he quoted, couldnt tell me strait off his head)

 

[Ladies Man]

Originally posted by: Walleye
alright, i was on IRC at diabloii.net... (irc.webmaster.com/diabloii)

and the mod dumbass says this:

"most strait guys are [word i cant remember, means something about being middle class, and having middle class ideas, conformity, whatever] anyway"

i asked him to explain, he said cause i'm strait, i wouldnt understand.

i pressed him on it, he wouldnt explain. i went on to say that homosexuals as a group on average are better off financially than heterosexuals, as that's the only thing i could think of (cause i couldnt understand this argument one bit)

I think i've caught him in a bind, and he has no fvcking clue what he's talking about (and probably flipped thru a dictionary to find a word that people wouldnt know so he could feel important).

anyone wanna try and finish his argument for him? explain this BS to me?

turn off your computer
step outside
take a deep breath

then kill yourself

 

[alkemyst]

I dont know your mission here lately....

However how are homosexuals as a group better off financially than heterosexuals.

If anything they will need lube....lube is an extra cost even if $1 or free on AT hot deals.

 

[Walleye]

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
it seems that you have no idea what he was talking about, yet he's the dumbass. interesting.

i asked him to explain, and yet he refused.

if i said some bullsh1t that made absolutely no sense, wouldnt you ask me to explain, too?

 

[Walleye]

Originally posted by: alkemyst
I dont know your mission here lately....

However how are homosexuals as a group better off financially than heterosexuals.

If anything they will need lube....lube is an extra cost even if $1 or free on AT hot deals.

they're better off because jaguar said so in their justification for making adds that appeal more exclusively towards homosexuals.

 

[ScrapSilicon]

Originally posted by: Walleye

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
it seems that you have no idea what he was talking about, yet he's the dumbass. interesting.

i asked him to explain, and yet he refused.

if i said some bullsh1t that made absolutely no sense, wouldnt you ask me to explain, too?

explain

 

[her209]

what are you diong hanging around in a gay chatroom anyways?

 

[Walleye]

Originally posted by: her209
what are you diong hanging around in a gay chatroom anyways?

this is DIABLOII.NET!!! it's a game chatroom!

 

[Walleye]

Originally posted by: ScrapSilicon
explain

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: Walleye

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
it seems that you have no idea what he was talking about, yet he's the dumbass. interesting.

i asked him to explain, and yet he refused.

if i said some bullsh1t that made absolutely no sense, wouldnt you ask me to explain, too?

Let me get this "straight" . . . you don't have a clue what the other person was talking about - and you want US to explain it to you.



If you persist, you just open yourself up for even MORE ridicule. You like that?

 

[toekramp]

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
it seems that you have no idea what he was talking about, yet he's the dumbass. interesting.

 

[crumpet19]

dude, it seems like you start a hell of a lot of threads.

 

[isaacmacdonald]

Originally posted by: Walleye

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
it seems that you have no idea what he was talking about, yet he's the dumbass. interesting.

i asked him to explain, and yet he refused.

if i said some bullsh1t that made absolutely no sense, wouldnt you ask me to explain, too?

you really should.

I've read the original post 5 times now and I still can't string together what the actual argument is, or why you think he's a dumbass (other than for using a word you're not familiar with).

 

[Walleye]

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald

Originally posted by: Walleye

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
it seems that you have no idea what he was talking about, yet he's the dumbass. interesting.

i asked him to explain, and yet he refused.

if i said some bullsh1t that made absolutely no sense, wouldnt you ask me to explain, too?

you really should.

I've read the original post 5 times now and I still can't string together what the actual argument is, or why you think he's a dumbass (other than for using a word you're not familiar with).

i'm trying to figure out if there was a reason WHY he used that word, other than that he doesnt know what he's talking about, and is now trying to cover himself up by stonewalling.

 

[isaacmacdonald]

WHAT WORD?

 

[Walleye]

burgeios?

burgeois?

something like that.

some french word...

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: Walleye

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald

Originally posted by: Walleye

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
it seems that you have no idea what he was talking about, yet he's the dumbass. interesting.

i asked him to explain, and yet he refused.

if i said some bullsh1t that made absolutely no sense, wouldnt you ask me to explain, too?

you really should.

I've read the original post 5 times now and I still can't string together what the actual argument is, or why you think he's a dumbass (other than for using a word you're not familiar with).

i'm trying to figure out if there was a reason WHY he used that word, other than that he doesnt know what he's talking about, and is now trying to cover himself up by stonewalling.

We are thinking you're pretty clueless by now and I will drop out of this ridiculous thread.

Take it up with him (again - maybe you should ask him for a date) and . . . perhaps consider posting less unintelligable crap here.

I'm out of here.

burgeois

bour·geois ( P ) Pronunciation Key (br-zhwä, brzhw&auml
n. pl. bourgeois
A person belonging to the middle class.
A person whose attitudes and behavior are marked by conformity to the standards and conventions of the middle class.
In Marxist theory, a member of the property-owning class; a capitalist.

adj.
Of, relating to, or typical of the middle class.
Held to be preoccupied with respectability and material values.

aloha

 

[isaacmacdonald]

bourgeois

I'm afraid you've lost this battle.

try again.

 

[Walleye]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Walleye

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald

Originally posted by: Walleye

Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
it seems that you have no idea what he was talking about, yet he's the dumbass. interesting.

i asked him to explain, and yet he refused.

if i said some bullsh1t that made absolutely no sense, wouldnt you ask me to explain, too?

you really should.

I've read the original post 5 times now and I still can't string together what the actual argument is, or why you think he's a dumbass (other than for using a word you're not familiar with).

i'm trying to figure out if there was a reason WHY he used that word, other than that he doesnt know what he's talking about, and is now trying to cover himself up by stonewalling.

We are thinking you're pretty clueless by now and I will drop out of this ridiculous thread.

Take it up with him (again - maybe you should ask him for a date) and . . . perhaps consider posting less unintelligable crap here.

I'm out of here.

whatever. thanks for the bump.